Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: We would put guns in our mouths before selling out to Gamespy�
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2012-06-11, 06:27 PM | [Ignore Me] #61 | |||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
The problem with introducing these ships, especially on existing continents, is that they become the focus of the game. It's a game change so fundamental that the original gameplay is forever compromised. They are like BFRs in that way. The original intention of the BFR was to become the new center of the battle. Nothing matched a BFR, the best way to kill a BFR was to use another BFR. And the result was that life started to be a lot less fun for people who weren't driving a BFR. If airships are the solution then I'm not yet convinced that there was a problem. |
|||
|
2012-06-12, 09:18 AM | [Ignore Me] #62 | ||
Maybe I'm wrong about how space could work, time will tell.
A significant number of people consider the lack of naval warfare in PS to be a problem. I am one of them. Is PS a great game without a naval aspect? Yeah. Do I believe a naval aspect with an outfit focus will greatly improve the game? Absolutely. |
|||
|
2012-06-15, 11:30 AM | [Ignore Me] #65 | ||
I'm just happy PSU members have more reading comprehension than the PS Official Forums. Last time this idea was there the vast bulk of the posts were about how it will be the new BFR and farm everything in the game... because altitude locked airships with no weapons designed to engage ground targets are so good at farming lol.
|
|||
|
2012-06-15, 11:34 AM | [Ignore Me] #66 | |||
Major
|
|
|||
|
2012-06-15, 11:39 AM | [Ignore Me] #67 | |||
'Red Sixty Nine, why did you turn your targeting computer off?' 'Some dead clegger told me to trust the Force!' *Vaporized* Choose respawn location. |
||||
|
2012-06-15, 11:58 AM | [Ignore Me] #71 | ||
Second Lieutenant
|
they should really make the giant lazer cannon exhaust port be a weak spot for fair play.
Can yo imagine the scythe on mosquito dogfights that would happen as the vanu defended theirs, only to have the NC cruiser show up for all out war.* Sees the shadow of NC cruiser. Yeah were screwed |
||
|
2012-06-15, 01:27 PM | [Ignore Me] #72 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
But yeah on the overzealous anti-BFR crowd thing; people put waaaaay too much stock in things being like a BFR. I mean really, for example if the vanguards (or even prowler/mags) weren't in PS1 and were suggested in there forums "Oh hey, how about a tank that has a big cannon that the driver can operate that will do a lot of damage, but it costs resources to get" you'd probably have the same people above-mentioned going "NO BFR'S DIE!!!!!!!" |
|||
|
2012-06-15, 01:34 PM | [Ignore Me] #73 | |||
Major
|
|
|||
|
2012-06-15, 01:39 PM | [Ignore Me] #74 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
Definitely. And although I probably did not articulate my agreeable point of view on this issue, I do, well, agree with you! The main problems with BFR's was OP'd ****PLUS***** 1-man killtankbot. Split the power between multiple players and effectively you're eliminated potentially 2, 3, 5, 7 etc..(based on power) MAXes from the battlefield. If you've got two guys in a BFR and that's what it takes to man the damn thing (or whatever equipment/vehicles we're talking about in any given situation) then you're potentially eliminating two powerful on-ground characters otherwise. Or 3, or 5, or 7. I think it can definitely be done, and definitely agree with your assessment. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|