Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Where your quotes always get rejected.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-06-23, 10:30 PM | [Ignore Me] #61 | |||
Looking forward to seeing how they tune things in beta. Last edited by Wayside; 2012-06-23 at 10:31 PM. |
||||
|
2012-06-23, 10:36 PM | [Ignore Me] #62 | |||
Major
|
|
|||
|
2012-06-23, 10:45 PM | [Ignore Me] #65 | ||
Seriously. Heh heh...you WANT to stand near something like that for cover. To move with it. Perfectly natural. But people just aren't going to be able to get the most out of these vehicles tactically of they're little more than massive rolling bombs waiting for an excuse to blow up every friendly in a 10 meter radius.
This exact issue is, for me, at the heart of the one vs two man tank debate. I think tanks SHOULD be very difficult to bring down. Even with anti-vehicle weaponry. But its hard to justify the survivability of a tank when they can be spawned and manned by an individual. Now, if a tank requires 2 or 3 people to truly be effective, its MUCH more reasonable to assume that it would be difficult to take down. It is, after all, several people's worth of time and effort to operate. Last edited by Wayside; 2012-06-23 at 10:48 PM. |
|||
|
2012-06-24, 01:25 AM | [Ignore Me] #66 | ||
Major
|
It's kind of interesting that if you look closer there are actually two Prowlers and one Vanguard in the pic. Hard to tell because of all the smoke. Speaking of which I guess some TR threw a smoke grenade? At least I wouldn't want random explosions kicking up that much dust.
|
||
|
2012-06-24, 01:35 AM | [Ignore Me] #67 | |||
First Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|