PS2 Base Design - Page 5 - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: The only true cradle of the Hair God...
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2012-12-16, 11:40 AM   [Ignore Me] #61
Whiteagle
Major
 
Whiteagle's Avatar
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Originally Posted by SturmovikDrakon View Post
I don't see how, considering it looks like they are less detailed and more flat compared to this
Well look at the scale of them compared to that Vanguard man...

They look to be about two to three times larger then what we have in the game currently.
And I meant it when I said they were buildings in and of themselves, the tops appear to be enclosed structures about the width of most mid-sized buildings in the game.
Whiteagle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-16, 12:12 PM   [Ignore Me] #62
SturmovikDrakon
First Sergeant
 
SturmovikDrakon's Avatar
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Originally Posted by Whiteagle View Post
Well look at the scale of them compared to that Vanguard man...

They look to be about two to three times larger then what we have in the game currently.
And I meant it when I said they were buildings in and of themselves, the tops appear to be enclosed structures about the width of most mid-sized buildings in the game.
Hmm

I guess you're right

The walls look like bunkers

Man, what I'd give to just test those assets myself, in a separate server
SturmovikDrakon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-16, 02:24 PM   [Ignore Me] #63
Whiteagle
Major
 
Whiteagle's Avatar
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Originally Posted by SturmovikDrakon View Post
Hmm

I guess you're right

The walls look like bunkers

Man, what I'd give to just test those assets myself, in a separate server
I know right?

One of those wall towers alone would make a better Outpost then most we have now...


...Malorn, are you reading this?
See if you can't get your hands on those old assets.

You can call it "The Stand" (subtitle: Hope Rides Aaaaalloooooonnnneee!).
Whiteagle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-16, 05:57 PM   [Ignore Me] #64
Mordelicius
Major
 
Mordelicius's Avatar
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


The quickest fixes they can add to smaller outpost/bases :

1. Give spawn room 3 doors instead of 2. This is to prevent the tanks especially Magriders from camping and shooting perpendicular to the door. Infantry has no chance if a supposed tank go to a side of a steep cliff (something other tanks can't do) and blast players from the side as they exit. There's no way to hit back if they are hidden from the two narrow openings.

2. Double the width of the door. This makes it even harder for tanks to spawn camp because it will provide players much wider angles to hit back.

3. Open the ceiling up, shielded of course, to prevent Aircraft from easily camping the doorway egress areas.

4. Add an AA on the top outer corner on the spawn room that can be repaired from the inside. Again this is to stop aerial spawn campers. If players are stuck inside, there will be no way to destroy that AA turret if there are multitudes of trapped engineers healing it and soon that Aircraft will expire or fly away from attrition.
Mordelicius is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-16, 07:38 PM   [Ignore Me] #65
capiqu
Contributor
First Lieutenant
 
capiqu's Avatar
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Tech, and Amp stations should have spawn rooms in the main buildings just as Bio labs do. Keep 2 spawn facilities outside the main building on each side. These could serve as the towers in Planetside 1. The enemy can capture the outer spawn facilities and we would still have control of the main building. This would give us the great fight styles of Planetside 1 even bigger.

As far as the outpost. If you spawn at a tower in Planetside 1 and stick your head out a door, tanks and air would blow you away. Outside of any building your fair game. you cant take that away from tank drivers and flyers. But as some have pointed out, if the spawn and CC are on the same building you have a better shot at defending the outpost. Then it would be up to a greater number of enemy infantry to go in and take that CC from you and capture the outpost.
Also it would be nice to see additional equipment terminals in all those empty building as well as an additional spawn room which the enemy can capture and from which they can launch there attacks on the outpost CC building
__________________



Last edited by capiqu; 2012-12-16 at 07:40 PM.
capiqu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-16, 07:57 PM   [Ignore Me] #66
Figment
Lieutenant General
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Originally Posted by capiqu View Post
As far as the outpost. If you spawn at a tower in Planetside 1 and stick your head out a door, tanks and air would blow you away. Outside of any building your fair game. you cant take that away from tank drivers and flyers.
On the other hand, one shouldn't make it too easy and infantry too vulnerable either.

There's predominantly need for balance in which skill determines who gains the upper hand. Infantry by definition have the weakest tools to work with, they must be able to use the environment to their advantage in order to compete.


Having no defensive fortifications means infantry cannot compete at all. You'd also never get significant infantry vs infanty outside without continuous dominant meddling by air and vehicles.

Whether you like it or not, competitive infantry in- and outdoor play is a major if not the attraction for FPS players in general, especially if they're not allowed to directly compete with air and vehicles in most situations.

One should not make a class feel incompetent, ignored or otherwise useless. You will lose those players and/or a playstyle variety. Ultimately, that makes the game more uniform, predictable and bland, while variety and unpredictability and competition is what makes a pvp game thrive.
Figment is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-17, 12:23 AM   [Ignore Me] #67
Whiteagle
Major
 
Whiteagle's Avatar
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Originally Posted by capiqu View Post
Tech, and Amp stations should have spawn rooms in the main buildings just as Bio labs do. Keep 2 spawn facilities outside the main building on each side. These could serve as the towers in Planetside 1. The enemy can capture the outer spawn facilities and we would still have control of the main building. This would give us the great fight styles of Planetside 1 even bigger.
Well I'd agree with moving the spawns into the main structures of the Tech Plants and Amp Stations, I think the current satellite point spawns are good enough for attackers...

Originally Posted by capiqu View Post
As far as the outpost. If you spawn at a tower in Planetside 1 and stick your head out a door, tanks and air would blow you away. Outside of any building your fair game. you cant take that away from tank drivers and flyers. But as some have pointed out, if the spawn and CC are on the same building you have a better shot at defending the outpost. Then it would be up to a greater number of enemy infantry to go in and take that CC from you and capture the outpost.
Well I don't think we'll ever be completely free of aerial camping, since swarms of A2G will hover when ever they get a chance, but it would be nice if there were areas in the game with a definite need for infantry involvement.

Originally Posted by capiqu View Post
Also it would be nice to see additional equipment terminals in all those empty building as well as an additional spawn room which the enemy can capture and from which they can launch there attacks on the outpost CC building
Don't know about extra terminals, but there isn't a need for Enemy spawns at Outpost...

I mean, any competent attacking force brings an S-AMS along with them, or at least a Squad Beacon in case things aren't as easy as they were expecting.

Do they really need the advantage of a local spawn for a simple Outpost when they already have the initiative?

Originally Posted by Figment View Post
Having no defensive fortifications means infantry cannot compete at all. You'd also never get significant infantry vs infanty outside without continuous dominant meddling by air and vehicles.

Whether you like it or not, competitive infantry in- and outdoor play is a major if not the attraction for FPS players in general, especially if they're not allowed to directly compete with air and vehicles in most situations.

One should not make a class feel incompetent, ignored or otherwise useless. You will lose those players and/or a playstyle variety. Ultimately, that makes the game more uniform, predictable and bland, while variety and unpredictability and competition is what makes a pvp game thrive.
Indeed, which is why I agree that there needs to be an eventual overhaul of the current Outpost with more defensible building assets.

These "Office-huts of the Future-as-designed-by-Alcoa" are little more then just that; futuristic set clutter in the vague shape of buildings.

Just because most Vehicles can't drive right inside of them doesn't make them a proper position for Infantry to fight them from.
Whiteagle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-17, 08:05 AM   [Ignore Me] #68
Figment
Lieutenant General
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Alright so I made a case study of Aurora Materials Lab, which is a base that changes hands constantly right now because every time you walk in, you already won. Currently all you need to do is get an AMS to the central CY, a tank on the south spawn exit and you win.

I've tried to give a brief impression of the situation as is below.




Then I've made some modifications (probably a few more than absolutely necessary). However, I'd say it's still pretty easy to enter, but would provide an organised assault with some challenges when defended.



Defense should be easier then now, but they'll still have to be very flexible and active. Infantry is now very important in securing the base, while vehicles are important in moving up to the base.

I've also tried to ensure there's plenty of infiltrator objectives, from gate securing to SOI destruction to SCU destruction and CC hacking.

Also note the SOI generator (in CY here, could be located on top of a building too).

Could add some elevators at wall walk ends next to buildings so people can get to the roof more easily when walking along the outpost wall.

Thoughts?

Last edited by Figment; 2012-12-17 at 08:08 AM.
Figment is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-17, 08:33 AM   [Ignore Me] #69
Canaris
Contributor
General
 
Canaris's Avatar
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Originally Posted by Figment View Post


Defense should be easier then now, but they'll still have to be very flexible and active. Infantry is now very important in securing the base, while vehicles are important in moving up to the base.

I've also tried to ensure there's plenty of infiltrator objectives, from gate securing to SOI destruction to SCU destruction and CC hacking.

Also note the SOI generator (in CY here, could be located on top of a building too).

Could add some elevators at wall walk ends next to buildings so people can get to the roof more easily when walking along the outpost wall.

Thoughts?
I would really love to try out that gameplay, that's for sure. SOI would be great to have back though I think 3 shield gens for an outpost might be overkill
__________________

"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war, and now there ain't no going back. I mean shit, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it! If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight. "
Slim Charles aka Tallman - The Wire
BRTD Mumble Server powered by Gamercomms
Canaris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-17, 08:43 AM   [Ignore Me] #70
Figment
Lieutenant General
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Originally Posted by Canaris View Post
I would really love to try out that gameplay, that's for sure. SOI would be great to have back though I think 3 shield gens for an outpost might be overkill
Just showcasing the options. Having a good outer perimeter is pretty important though. If vehicles can always get in on their own, that severely reduces the importance of the blockade runner Sunderer upgrade. I'd rather create some reliance on infantry, which truth be told, can get in pretty easily still.

Still, I'd like to see people use a blockade runner Sundy with minefield upgrade now and then to take out a shield gen objective by running the gates, rather than always bring the AMS variant because it is more +10 exp pts.
Figment is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-17, 09:02 AM   [Ignore Me] #71
Canaris
Contributor
General
 
Canaris's Avatar
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Originally Posted by Figment View Post
Just showcasing the options. Having a good outer perimeter is pretty important though. If vehicles can always get in on their own, that severely reduces the importance of the blockade runner Sunderer upgrade. I'd rather create some reliance on infantry, which truth be told, can get in pretty easily still.

Still, I'd like to see people use a blockade runner Sundy with minefield upgrade now and then to take out a shield gen objective by running the gates, rather than always bring the AMS variant because it is more +10 exp pts.
ahh I see now sorry thought it was you need to drop the three gens for access, instead they power they're own indivdual gates. That's clever why I was worried over the 3 was having to do whack a mole to keep them down, instead you can drop one and have that route in. No that's a great idea. Was eating lunch while looking at it, had ham and cheese on the mind lawl
__________________

"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war, and now there ain't no going back. I mean shit, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it! If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight. "
Slim Charles aka Tallman - The Wire
BRTD Mumble Server powered by Gamercomms
Canaris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-17, 09:13 AM   [Ignore Me] #72
Hmr85
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Hmr85's Avatar
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Awesome, I love it and would love to give that outpost a try. SOE hire this man.
__________________


Hmr85 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-17, 10:14 AM   [Ignore Me] #73
Figment
Lieutenant General
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Btw, I'm pondering on how infiltrators could have a stealth edge opposed to LA's mobility edge in taking these generators out. Perhaps the general overload warning doesn't appear as fast with different grades of hacking. Then people have equal time to respond, but they'll have to pay more attention to the overload and hacking sounds than the facility warnings.
Figment is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-17, 10:26 AM   [Ignore Me] #74
Crator
Major General
 
Crator's Avatar
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Originally Posted by Figment View Post
Then I've made some modifications (probably a few more than absolutely necessary). However, I'd say it's still pretty easy to enter, but would provide an organised assault with some challenges when defended.



Defense should be easier then now, but they'll still have to be very flexible and active. Infantry is now very important in securing the base, while vehicles are important in moving up to the base.
This is excellent! Can we please try this? Where's Malorn?
__________________
>>CRATOR<<
Don't feed the trolls, unless it's funny to do so...
Crator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-17, 05:19 PM   [Ignore Me] #75
Whiteagle
Major
 
Whiteagle's Avatar
 
Re: PS2 Base Design


Originally Posted by Figment View Post
Alright so I made a case study of Aurora Materials Lab, which is a base that changes hands constantly right now because every time you walk in, you already won. Currently all you need to do is get an AMS to the central CY, a tank on the south spawn exit and you win.

...


Then I've made some modifications (probably a few more than absolutely necessary). However, I'd say it's still pretty easy to enter, but would provide an organised assault with some challenges when defended.



Defense should be easier then now, but they'll still have to be very flexible and active. Infantry is now very important in securing the base, while vehicles are important in moving up to the base.

I've also tried to ensure there's plenty of infiltrator objectives, from gate securing to SOI destruction to SCU destruction and CC hacking.

Also note the SOI generator (in CY here, could be located on top of a building too).

Could add some elevators at wall walk ends next to buildings so people can get to the roof more easily when walking along the outpost wall.

Thoughts?
Love it.

Especially love the SoI jammer, since every outpost seems to have those big ass antenna but only a few use them to mark the position of the Control Console.

The only thing I don't understand is Shield Generator C, since it only covers a small entryway...
...Kind of a waste of a shield generator if you ask me.

Originally Posted by Figment View Post
Btw, I'm pondering on how infiltrators could have a stealth edge opposed to LA's mobility edge in taking these generators out. Perhaps the general overload warning doesn't appear as fast with different grades of hacking. Then people have equal time to respond, but they'll have to pay more attention to the overload and hacking sounds than the facility warnings.
Easy, give them a suit option that allows them to carry more anti-personal explosives!

Smart cloakers should be using their stealth to disrupt the enemies ability to move effectively, and what better bait to send them to the spawn countdown then an overloaded generator?
Whiteagle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 PM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.