AI in 5 Year Plan

[Skitrel]

Originally Posted by Atuday

Hey look guys. SOE is at it again ruining another of the awesome games they make. This time by adding AI because we already shot down the BFR idea.

This is why I hate forums.

[Hamma]

Originally Posted by Skitrel

This is why I hate forums.

Because these sort of comments aren't posted anywhere else on the internet.

Originally Posted by Atuday

Hey look guys. SOE is at it again ruining another of the awesome games they make. This time by adding AI because we already shot down the BFR idea.

But seriously.. troll fail.

[Sardus]

Hmmm.. really depends on how they add it in.. but I've always been against AI. I'm always for more game economy though - resource control, base building, etc.

[Whalenator]

Originally Posted by Hamma

But seriously.. troll fail.

It's actually just one of [321]'s 2000 troll accounts, all simultaneously trolling 24/7. It's true, ask him.

[cellinaire]

Urgggh.... they already talked about it last year. Why acting like you're surprised?

[Cosmical]

Originally Posted by Atuday

Hey look guys. SOE is at it again ruining another of the awesome games they make. This time by adding AI because we already shot down the BFR idea.

I wouldnt mind the BFR making a reapearance ACTUALLY as some kindof command vehicle. High level command rank players can deploy it, and it gives them a huge area of assessment of the battlefield.

No weapons. High armour. And a skilled commander could use it to direct the battle, while at the same time being a sitting duck.

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER!!

[cellinaire]

Originally Posted by Atuday

Hey look guys. SOE is at it again ruining another of the awesome games they make. This time by adding AI because we already shot down the BFR idea.

Introduction of AI and unbalanced, half-tested, teamwork-affecting BFR have same magnitude, you say?

[Skitrel]

Originally Posted by Hamma

Because these sort of comments aren't posted anywhere else on the internet.




But seriously.. troll fail.

They're in far fewer quantity over on reddit at least, as well as downvoted to oblivion so nobody has to look at them.

I always find myself wishing I could downvote on forums.

[Hamma]

https://twitter.com/#!/Mnementh2230/...66485138440193

Per the GDC Q&A:

AI in 5 years is just an option, we'll see when we get there

[Malorn]

If PS2 survives to year 5 it won't need AI. Unless nobody is playing it.

I try to keep an open mind on ideas since the PS devs have shown themselves to be competent and have good designs, but PS isn't a game that needs AI. Players are the content. Having AI implies that players aren't enough content, and I simply don't agree with that notion. I believe AI would detract from the game.

[Vancha]

Originally Posted by SniperSteve

My thoughts... You don't see AI running around in any other good shooter...

Not a L4D fan, huh?

[ringring]

I've nothing much to add, except to say +1 to the no to AI vote ..... excepting engy deployables such as spits.....

[Crator]

Originally Posted by Malorn

If PS2 survives to year 5 it won't need AI. Unless nobody is playing it.

I try to keep an open mind on ideas since the PS devs have shown themselves to be competent and have good designs, but PS isn't a game that needs AI. Players are the content. Having AI implies that players aren't enough content, and I simply don't agree with that notion. I believe AI would detract from the game.

/sarcasmon Ya, cause we all know from previous experience with PS1 that it worked this way. /sarcasmoff

[IronMole]

If the F2P model remains the same way throughout those 5 years and unless SOE severely screw up PS2 - I don't foresee any population problems at all...

[Canaris]

sounds like some VS plot to me, AI in their 5 year plan...... sinister, they're going to scoop out peoples brains and replace them with cyber hamsters! :o

Well I won't really worry about bombing this idea till I hear more about it beside a "AI in our 5 year plan" which tbh means nothing to me.