Planetside for real? - Page 6

RabidPlatypus · 2003-01-24, 02:32 PM

holy fuck rev just because the guy with down symdrome who sits next to you in middle school says there's a time machine doesn't mean there is one....your arguement is basically "I'm right and if you don't agree with me, you're in another dimension hohalaoloaljala"

Diego · 2003-01-24, 04:51 PM

Rabid do you have ANY other purpose than to ruin our forums??? Honestly..

Denali · 2003-01-24, 05:32 PM

First of all, Thanks for posting all that stuff Tobias, it was very enlightening (credible or not) and fun to read. Anything's possible

Secondly, to the religious comment about mortals not being able to see into the future, ever read Revelations?

den

Lexington_Steele · 2003-01-24, 06:22 PM

Originally posted by [sF]Diego
Rabid do you have ANY other purpose than to ruin our forums??? Honestly..

Are you trying to take the Rabid out of Platypus?

Hijinks · 2003-01-24, 07:43 PM

Originally posted by Lexington_Steele
Alright Rev, I'll bite. Where is the evidence for this, what scientific principals are involved, and where did you hear about this?

And explain to me what you mean by "Depends on what dimension you are on?"

He is a super sekret government agent who has been trained in the super sekret methods of Remote Viewing(tm). Too bad he deleted the post where he claimed it. Guess they didn't like the fact that he was using the skills they taught him to cheat his bookie.

chaos1428 · 2003-01-24, 08:00 PM

Its actually not super "sekret". You can find info on it just about anywhere. TV, books, the web. Maybe you should look around a little before you start acting like a 7 year old.

Yuyi · 2003-01-24, 08:08 PM

Diego · 2003-01-24, 08:21 PM

Originally posted by Lexington_Steele
Are you trying to take the Rabid out of Platypus?

I personally believe he should be banned..

Navaron · 2003-01-24, 08:23 PM

Did I stumble onto the official forums...nope. I guess it just seems like it. Sure are a lot a babies here. Grow up.

Sputty · 2003-01-24, 08:25 PM

They're just lucky the W.A.M.S haven't become mods yet.

Lexington_Steele · 2003-01-24, 10:11 PM

Originally posted by chaos1428
Its actually not super "sekret". You can find info on it just about anywhere. TV, books, the web. Maybe you should look around a little before you start acting like a 7 year old.

Alright then I pose the questions to you then.

Where is the evidence for this, what scientific principals are involved, and where did you hear about this?

And explain to me what Rev mean by "Depends on what dimension you are on?"

If the information is everywhere you should have no problem diggin it up for me.

Shyfted One · 2003-01-24, 10:39 PM

Originally posted by RabidPlatypus
deja vu comes from subconscious memories that are very similar.

Everything you do, even if you can't remember it, is stored in your brain. So say you are listening to the radio in the car and you have your arms in a certain position, and a song comes on.

Say another day you have your arms in the same position and you are in the same car and the same song comes on the radio again. You won't remember the old situation, but you still get that weird deja vu feeling.

So how would that apply to a dream I had one summer about visiting my grandparents in Florida and having a conversation with my grandmom then the next summer actually going to visit (Note: This was my 1st time EVER at their house since they moved recently) and actually had the same conversation I had dreamt one year earlier, recognizing everything that was being said and not altering it even though I knew what was going to be said next? The weird thing is, this is a regular thing for me. I don't usually remember my dreams, but those I do I end up experiencing days, weeks, or months later. Freaky, huh

I don't think it's possible to travel backwards in time, but I think you could travel forwards because the future is determined by the present so whatever you do while in the future may or may not actually happen...but then you get into all these theories about how if the present got altered after going into the future could that have changed the experience of the trip to the future in the 1st place and then and then and then...AHHHHHHHH!

chaos1428 · 2003-01-24, 10:53 PM

I am not totally sure what he was getting at. I would wager a guess, that he was simply saying "how deep you're willing to think, and how much you're able to accept", kind of thing.

I just don't find it hard to believe, that the human brain is capable of alot more than we use it for. Its common knowledge that we only use 13 percent of it now. The what the hell is the rest for? I'm not going to say time travel (not sure where I stand on that) but I do believe that we are capable of Remote viewing. I beleive in psycics (not all, obviously), mental healing, telekenesis, ESP, and mental projection. Nothing is impossible, just highly improbable. Human beings are capable of sooo much, and it sickens me when people say things are impossible, and stupid, and anyone who agrees with it is a retard.

I suppose its not entirely their fault. We have been raised in a society that has molded our thinking to the point of needing absolute proof of something, before it is believed.

If people would just cease that kind of negative thinking, and have more of an open mind to things, mankind could finally develope.

And as for your project, Lex. I don't read up much about any of this stuff online. I mostly read books on it, because I have nothing else to do at work. But, I did a little bit of looking, so I'll give ya a couple web sites.

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/ESPionage.html

http://www.irva.org/

http://www.probablefuture.com/home1.htm

Lexington_Steele · 2003-01-25, 01:14 AM

I read through a good deal of that and they could produce no scientific theory as to why remote viewing work. They produce all kinds of number concerning what effects all kinds of stimuli have on the brain but then don't go anywhere with those numbers.

They glazed of many significat issuses that I have with RV:

When they talked about evidence, all they had to say was that the scientists working on it weren't doing proof oriented experiments.

When they adressed the question of why hasn't this topic been in the media, all they had to say was that this field of science is akin to hersay like other science has been in the past. And the media won't pick it up.

The bottom line, they all failed to produce a single piece of evidence to suggest that RV exists. They failed to produce a single theory as to how RV works. None of them are creditable news publications or scientific journals.

There was just not a single thing there that would suggest that RV exists except a plea for the reader to believe. I am not saying that this field of science is not worth study, however it is ridiculous to jump to the conclusion that RV exists and is effectively everyday use by our government and the military.

chaos1428 · 2003-01-25, 01:38 AM

I'm not saying I am dumping millions of dollars into research. I'm just saying, after much reading, I happen to feel it is possible. I am entitled to my opinion, just as you are to yours.