Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
PSU: SPAM SPAM SPAM
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
View Poll Results: What do you identify yourself as? | |||
Atheist/Skeptic/Agnostic |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
151 | 70.89% |
Catholic |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 9.86% |
Protestant |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 11.27% |
Jewish |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 2.35% |
Muslim |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 0.94% |
Philisophy (Such as Buddhism) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 4.69% |
Voters: 213. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #77 | ||
Genetics is a science. If you're not trained in a field of science, then you're not qualified to have an opinion on it, and how you feel it might work doesn't matter as you don't have the training or experience to make your feeling worth considering. Even those of us with science undergraduate degrees are not even close to qualified. Unless you're a published PhD when it comes to a fundamental aspect of a given science, nobody cares what your opinion is because you don't know anything.
What's worse, it's far more likely that, rather than having an opinion as an educated layperson which might simply suffer from higher-end ignorance of the topic, you simply don't understand the fundamentals. If you've never taken any university-level courses in genetics at all, I would have to wonder exactly what this unimportant opinion of yours is even predicated on. Some Google searches? A creationism YouTube video? Oh, and just to spoil the end of this for you, you're wrong and should not assert things about genetics you clearly have no idea about. Last edited by Warborn; 2012-03-04 at 06:13 PM. |
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #78 | ||||
Major
|
Last edited by Fenrys; 2012-03-04 at 06:27 PM. |
||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #79 | ||
Ah yes, the ol' "science is a religion" schtick that stupid, uneducated people trot out anytime someone spanks them for trying to make scientific assertions despite being entirely ignorant about the topic they're discussing. Your dumb is golden, Fenrys. Keep it up.
|
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #81 | |||
Colonel
|
You need to take a lot of university courses or read a lot before it starts to make sense. I've taken a few classes, but I can't really go into depth. The topics are outside my field of study. Your second comment sounds like a pretty ignorant understanding of genetics. Reminds me of the alternate theory of evolution. Lamarck's theory.
__________________
[Thoughts and Ideas on the Direction of Planetside 2] Last edited by Sirisian; 2012-03-04 at 07:57 PM. |
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #82 | |||
Second Lieutenant
|
BOOM GIRAFFE NECKS.
__________________
>( 666th Devil Dogs )< Alpha Tester: Tribes: Ascend Modder: Mount & Blade: Warband Player: Garry'sMod, Arma 2, Air Buccaneers Lover: Planetside NC Brig. General ಠ_ರೃ |
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #83 | |||
Major
|
It's an internally consistent model, and predictively useful. For any given system there are a number of possible models that will be accurate enough to be predictively useful. The model that students are taught is often the one that best simplifies the math, and IMO this is as it should be. However, I remain unconvinced that the current (useful and precise) model of evolution accurately reflects reality as it truly is. There are too many questions that remain unanswered, especially regarding the genesis of energy and negative entropy. I don't believe that we have yet emerged from Plato's cave. Concomitant to my skepticism regarding our understanding of the basic nature of reality, I observe that many patterns repeat themselves at various scales. Atoms look like solar systems, solar systems look like galaxies, galaxies and nebulae form a macro scale web that resembles the micro scale foam of background radiation and virtual particles. Trees look like blood vessels, a styrofoam peanut falling into a whirlpool looks like a photon falling into a black hole, and a coastline looks like a coastline no matter how far in or out you zoom the camera. Without having an explanation that I find satisfactory for the next leap that I make, I suspect that consciousness could be one of the patterns that repeats in this apparently fractal-like reality. Energy vortices at very small and very large scales could potentially be self-aware and have a pattern that is similar to the self-organizing energy vortex that is our brain (or whatever the source of our consciousness may be). If that were the case, it would follow that events that are apparently random to observes at the human scale, could in fact be the result of a decision made by an entity that believes itself possessed of free will. Last edited by Fenrys; 2012-03-04 at 09:48 PM. |
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #84 | ||||||
Master Sergeant
|
On the other hand, I have no issue with gay marriage or abortion being voted on by the people (I support gay marriage, and I have no feelings on abortion either way). If the people want it then they should damn well have it. This is supposed to be a democracy, not a theocracy.
__________________
I reserve all judgment till Beta. But I'm still going to point and laugh. |
||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #86 | ||
Colonel
|
I had no idea the playerbase was so slanted away from people who subscribe to anything that might be a universal sense of right and wrong, but it sure fits with the character of the people I see online and in this forum.
__________________
Bagger 288 Last edited by Traak; 2012-03-04 at 11:06 PM. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #88 | ||
Colonel
|
You mean objectively right and wrong? The poll can't really tell you much about right and wrong. While a lot of Atheists follow a more humanist philosophy of right and wrong which tends to be more objectively guided it would be wrong to assume that. Currently you have 11 people that follow a religious teaching and a form of biblical right and wrong. (Assuming they cherry picked the right passages to follow). I don't see anything universal about that. Though "universal" is a misnomer since it's subjectively biased.
__________________
[Thoughts and Ideas on the Direction of Planetside 2] Last edited by Sirisian; 2012-03-04 at 11:26 PM. |
||
![]() |
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|