NC just doesn't understand - Page 7

Delirare · 2003-04-16, 05:36 PM

First: Phoenix takes 3 to kill a reaver, 2 for a mosq. not 2 for a reaver.

Second: PHOENIX not PHEONIX

Third: Phoenix does not have a dumb fire like so many of you believe it does.

-- Balancing Issues as i see them

Phoenix seems fine to me, i stand by my claim of sucky indoors use and pathetic rof balance it out. It is only accurate vs slow moving things, maxes can avoid them and planes easily can if they arent n00bs. Plus your massively vulnerable while firing it and its only good vs some targets. Armored targets. worthless vs infantry types. Striker needs its 'locking' feature tweaked. then its fine. Lancer needs lots of help, its mighty sad.

Phoenix isnt unbalanced. Phoenix is where it should be for an AV weapon, striker is almost there, lancer needs some work. dont nerf. fix.

gauss overpowered==joke.
Jackhammer needs more power in close range, but keep its range very minimal like it is now. Vanu needs help with its assault rifle.

Anarion · 2003-04-16, 06:02 PM

Originally posted by Airlift
It is ubertarded to claim the gauss is overpowered in the same post that you claim the Chaingun is not. Furthermore, it reeks of lobbyism.

I guess not caring what you think will help me sleep better at nights..

Love to discuss it with ya, but you're all insult, no substance.. Which speaks volumes about what your opinion's worth..

Airlift · 2003-04-16, 06:59 PM

Sorry, I gave it all the attention it deserved. I can only read the same factional lobbying so many times before I get insulting. BTW, if you're short on context, it would be an insult for me to call you an ubertard, but everything I said was directed at your statement.

Please unbundle your panties and don't take it so personally.

In conclusion, smilies:

Anarion · 2003-04-17, 01:43 AM

Lemme see.. Nope, still don't care.. No, really...

As far as not taking it personally, right back at ya...

Originally posted by Airlift
Sorry, I gave it all the attention it deserved. I can only read the same factional lobbying so many times before I get insulting. BTW, if you're short on context, it would be an insult for me to call you an ubertard, but everything I said was directed at your statement.

Please unbundle your panties and don't take it so personally.

In conclusion, smilies: