Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Rejecting quotes since '03
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
View Poll Results: Reavers | |||
They are fine. I like my reaver. | 29 | 25.22% | |
They need to be toned down. Less armor. | 16 | 13.91% | |
They need to be toned down. Less rockets. | 3 | 2.61% | |
They need to be toned down. Less (or no) afterburner. | 8 | 6.96% | |
They need to be toned down. | 15 | 13.04% | |
They are fine but we need better AA weapons. | 32 | 27.83% | |
They suck. Dio rul3z!! | 12 | 10.43% | |
Voters: 115. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-06-03, 07:51 AM | [Ignore Me] #91 | ||
Corporal
|
My point about the tanks was not so much their numbers. I suppose I didn't articulate my train of thought properly but, if I am in a squad of ground troops that is not equipped to deal with armor, I shouldn't be surprised that they run all over us. If that same squad had several people capable of carrying Strikers or Decimators, the odds even up, provided our troops play smart. The same holds true against Reavers.
It's all very simple, really: If you don't want to be pwned by Reavers, bring along an AA MAX and/or friendly aircraft with you if you plan on being exposed to air attack. Reavers are not that hard to bring down if the correct weapons and tactics are brought to bear on them. The answer is not to tune Reavers down, it's to tune peoples' intelligence up. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|