Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: This message will take over your mind in 20 seconds.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rating: | Display Modes |
2012-08-16, 10:45 AM | [Ignore Me] #121 | ||
Corporal
|
I wouldnt say no to a locked 120degree FOV, then the full 360 if you allowed someone else to gun - subject to play testing obviously, but armour buffs/damage buffs because you allow someone else to gun is unfair IMO.
I still have grave concerns for anything that forces people off the battlefield just for the sake of it. As for tanks being too powerful for someone, they are bullet magnets for just about everyone and anyone. In a tank everyone is truly your enemy. Any good reaver/inf with a/v can tear a tank to prices proving there is some cover (anywhere near a base) or you have afterburner at the ready. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 |
||
|
2012-08-18, 06:05 AM | [Ignore Me] #122 | ||
Private
|
And the same can be said of people caught out on foot. The simple fact is in a tank solo you have more survivability and more power than any infantryman and you can still get out when damaged and do what you would otherwise do on foot.
Surely you can see that a faster, higher damage, armoured body suit isnt in any way fair? By restricting the power output and making you vulnerable because you cant return fire/move at the same time you do balance that. I have a feeling what you really like about solo tanking is the feeling of dominance you get when you do it. Thats not good game play. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Tags |
certification, dedicated, driver, mbt |
|
|