Cockpit View - [Now Forced per Higby]

[Malorn]

I don't see how this poll is biased.

Should cockpit view be forced?
Yes
No

Where's the bias? While a lot of polls on this forum are biased or asking a useless question I thought this was one of the few that wasn't.

[Malorn]

Let me rephrase since that was difficult for you to understand.

How would you re-phrase the poll question such that it had no bias?

[SKYeXile]

Originally Posted by Malorn

Let me rephrase since that was difficult for you to understand.

How would you re-phrase the poll question such that it had no bias?

I dunno maybe like how i said 9 posts up? or was that too difficult for you to understand?

I used to actually respect your posting, agreed with none of it, but ever since you joined the enclave you have pretty much turned full retard.

[Malorn]

You claimed the poll was useless, you didn't offer a better phrasing. As best I can tell you didn't like the result of the poll so are now criticizing its legitimacy.

[SKYeXile]

Originally Posted by Malorn

You claimed the poll was useless, you didn't offer a better phrasing. As best I can tell you didn't like the result of the poll so are now criticizing its legitimacy.

Sometimes you need to read between the lines Malorn, CLEARLY this pole is going to have once sided results because one answer is unbalanced because it offers no terms or negatives to it. The pole obviously needed 3 options(As i said now 11 posts up) or the no needed to be clarified with a clause or negative to it like: at the loss of free look.

[Malorn]

Don't know if trolling or just stupid.

[ArcIyte]

Originally Posted by Malorn

Don't know if trolling or just stupid.

Malorn, I used to respect your posting, but now that you disagree with my completely illegible point you really are a full blown dumbie head

[Stardouser]

Originally Posted by SKYeXile

Sometimes you need to read between the lines Malorn, CLEARLY this pole is going to have once sided results because one answer is unbalanced because it offers no terms or negatives to it. The pole obviously needed 3 options(As i said now 11 posts up) or the no needed to be clarified with a clause or negative to it like: at the loss of free look.

There were so many people who not only voted for forced cockpits, but posted a few words about it too, clearly indicating an understanding of the issue, that the results are clear even if you did somehow find some bias.

Loss of free look does NOT make turning the cockpit off appropriate. Free look should in fact be present regardless of cockpit on or off. The issue here is whether the cockpit view should be forced, not whether or not free look should exist.

[SKYeXile]

Originally Posted by Stardouser

There were so many people who not only voted for forced cockpits, but posted a few words about it too, clearly indicating an understanding of the issue, that the results are clear even if you did somehow find some bias.

Loss of free look does NOT make turning the cockpit off appropriate. Free look should in fact be present regardless of cockpit on or off. The issue here is whether the cockpit view should be forced, not whether or not free look should exist.

If you read the thread, most people who voted for forced and posted in this thread voted yes because they said it would be unbalanced to play without the cockpit view, effectively rendering it useless.