F2P problem to be? - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: We like it raw!
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
Click here to go to the first VIP post in this thread.  
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2012-06-02, 12:06 PM   [Ignore Me] #1
Attackmack
Corporal
 
F2P problem to be?


This might have been discussed and answered but im retarded and cant work out the search ( or maybe im not and do and just lazy).

But without a monthly sub income, how can SOE expect to have the continous funds to pay for the server/staff upkeep for a server and support heavy game like PS2?

Because with all said and done, how long do they think that cosmetics and boosters will generate income? A few months perhaps? And after that, it will be s few purchases here and there.

Im seriously worried about this. I would prefer s monthly sub to secure the stability and conitinued support. The other option is a pay to win option and that is thankfully (hopefully) out of the question.

Thoughts?


Oh yeah, snd TR for all times! Die VS and NC scum!
Attackmack is offline  
Reply With Quote
Click here to go to the next VIP post in this thread.   Old 2012-06-02, 12:07 PM   [Ignore Me] #2
Malorn
Contributor
PlanetSide 2
Game Designer
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


Hats.
__________________
Malorn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-02, 12:08 PM   [Ignore Me] #3
JHendy
First Sergeant
 
JHendy's Avatar
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


MAXs that look like Gundams.
JHendy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-02, 12:08 PM   [Ignore Me] #4
KnightHawk ECID
Corporal
 
KnightHawk ECID's Avatar
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


Armour and equipment customization /thread
KnightHawk ECID is offline  
Reply With Quote
Click here to go to the next VIP post in this thread.   Old 2012-06-02, 12:11 PM   [Ignore Me] #5
Malorn
Contributor
PlanetSide 2
Game Designer
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


For more insight into their business model, watch this video.
__________________
Malorn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-02, 12:12 PM   [Ignore Me] #6
Mastachief
Contributor
Major
 
Mastachief's Avatar
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


Strap on's..


LOL seem to make millions.
__________________
Average play time of 2.8hours per day and falling.
Average play time of 2.5hours per day and falling. Need metagame.

Average play time of 2.0hours per day and falling. Need metagame / Continents.
Mastachief is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-02, 12:12 PM   [Ignore Me] #7
MyMeatStick
Sergeant
 
MyMeatStick's Avatar
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


They already mentioned there was going to be a paid subscription iirc.
MyMeatStick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-02, 12:13 PM   [Ignore Me] #8
NCLynx
Major
 
NCLynx's Avatar
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


Yea, people stopped buying things for TF2 years ago.
__________________

SuperTroopers is recruiting for PS2!
Originally Posted by Hamma View Post
Really? You need to take a few steps back and think before posting drivel like this. Either reply constructively or don't reply.
NCLynx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-02, 12:13 PM   [Ignore Me] #9
Mastachief
Contributor
Major
 
Mastachief's Avatar
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


Also, SOE are not new to f2p

DCUO to name but only one
__________________
Average play time of 2.8hours per day and falling.
Average play time of 2.5hours per day and falling. Need metagame.

Average play time of 2.0hours per day and falling. Need metagame / Continents.
Mastachief is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-02, 12:15 PM   [Ignore Me] #10
cBselfmonkey
Sergeant
 
cBselfmonkey's Avatar
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


D&D Online, Champions Online, Lord of the Rings Online etc... Were all once sub based and failed to hold onto a large amount of subscribers post launch. When they did make the switch to F2P they not only usually ended up with a large, fairly stable player bases but they actually made more money. Heck the original Guild Wars is a great example of a F2P MMO that was a terrific success.

Not having a sub fee encourages more people to at least try the game. Something that could be especially important for PS2 considering how different it is from most other MMOs.
cBselfmonkey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-02, 12:16 PM   [Ignore Me] #11
CutterJohn
Colonel
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


Even if they add pay to win, so what? Its functionally identical to having a subscription, with the exception that you are still able to play if you choose not to pay, even if disadvantaged, instead of being unable to play at all.

The worry about 'pay to win' reaches completely irrational levels.
CutterJohn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Click here to go to the next VIP post in this thread.   Old 2012-06-02, 12:24 PM   [Ignore Me] #12
Malorn
Contributor
PlanetSide 2
Game Designer
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


Originally Posted by CutterJohn View Post
The worry about 'pay to win' reaches completely irrational levels.
It is the perception of unfairness and being deceived that players find most revolting. Nobody likes being lied to, taken advantage of, or swindled, regardless of how insignificant it might be.
__________________
Malorn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-02, 12:26 PM   [Ignore Me] #13
Haro
Master Sergeant
 
Haro's Avatar
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


If the devs manage to get their system anywhere near what Valve implemented for TF2, I won't be very concerned. The escapist video is right: structure your micro-transaction system the right way, and players will buy things. Even though valve does kinda skirt around the edges of the "don't sell power" rule, the game remains very profitable, popular, and largely balanced.
__________________
Haro is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-02, 12:29 PM   [Ignore Me] #14
Stardouser
Colonel
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


Malorn, just curious about something. There was a leaked speech from one of EA's investor meetings and the guy basically said two things of extreme interest about microtransactions:
1. He said that HE paid a lot of money per year on them(he either said $1500 or $5000, can't remember which)
2. He made a comment about how when the player is in the middle of a firefight and needs to reload, they've got you(ie, charging for bullets).

One of my first thoughts was, you know, if you provide an MMO quality game(ie, a large scale persistent world) like PS2 is doing, I will be willing to pay around the equivalent of what a monthly sub would be, $200 per year or so. And I thought, we aren't all EA CEOs that can spend $5000 or even $1500 per year on bullets.

What do you think about that? Not necessarily that SOE is going to do this, but could that be something to fear elsewhere in the industry?

I'm not even talking about pay 2 win here, but the idea that we might end up forced to pay $1000 or more just to experience the full game.

Last edited by Stardouser; 2012-06-02 at 12:30 PM.
Stardouser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-02, 12:34 PM   [Ignore Me] #15
Runlikethewind
Private
 
Runlikethewind's Avatar
 
Re: F2P problem to be?


Great video, explains it well. I'm not worried about F2P PS2. From what I can tell they are doing it right. The subscription fee is what has kept me out of PS1 all this time. When I heard PS2 was going to be F2P I was ecstatic.
Runlikethewind is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 AM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.