Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Because apparently, spamming global chat just isnt enough
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-10-17, 08:11 AM | [Ignore Me] #16 | ||
Sergeant
|
These changes look like PS2 is heading more and more in the right direction. Granted, I still haven't played but I have been following this game closely, and I played the original PS back in its heyday.
Hopefully the devs implement these changes within the next few weeks because I have a feeling a lot of this stuff is going to really need to be tweaked by the wonderful beta testers. Release is getting closer and I get more giddy with anticipation as the days go by. |
||
|
2012-10-17, 12:03 PM | [Ignore Me] #17 | ||
Major
|
Now that Gals are no longer the major spawn points. How does this change the way that Tech plants and Biolabs should be designed? Both seemed to be made with the Gal solely in mind for how people would be assaulting the base. The lack of gals as spawns opens up some opportunities for remodeling the current designs. (Looking at you giant space in the middle of tech plants)
Happy with some of these meta game changes but it's really not adding too much. The tech plant requirement for tanks means that those bases will have greater importance and will be heavily defended. That's a good thing but there's no way to access the tech plant outside of direct pushing. No back hacking or anything to allow the disabling of tanks or the ability to jump ahead. There really is only one right way of playing this game currently and that is the direct assault. Also if I were a dev I'd take a look at the maps for anti-v land mine use.
__________________
By hook or by crook, we will. Last edited by Captain1nsaneo; 2012-10-18 at 06:26 AM. Reason: Temporal Shenaniganry |
||
|
2012-10-17, 12:08 PM | [Ignore Me] #18 | ||
Contributor PlanetSide 2
Game Designer |
The squad leader spawn changes are intended to help with squad cohesion and keep your squad together.
Of the 3 changes... 1) You can spawn at a squad-owned spawn vehicle regardless of distance - this allows you to get back to your squad if you get separated or mis-click where you wanted to spawn. It could also be used to relocate a squad. Spawn beacons have done that for a long time, but it's also a pain to have people drop a spawn beacon anytime a member logs in and gets invited they then have to get to the squad. Currently the procedure is to drop a squad beacon so the newly invited person can join in. Allowing them to use any squad-spawn vehicles makes that easier. Helps disconnected players get back also. 2) Instant Action onto squad leader. Only works if instant action cooldown is up. This make sense and allows people who log in to quickly get to their squad immediately. No need for a beacon or sundy. With IA having a long cooldown I don't see the danger in this. I can see the possibility of abuse once every 30 minutes with a mass IA drop onto squad leaders. But on the other hand, that's kind of a cool thing for a squad to do! 3) Spawn on hard spawn points near squad leader. This is not the same as #2. It will basically put you at the closest outpost to your squad leader. Again squad cohesion. Seems like more of a fallback feature for when you don't have a squad spawn vehicle up. These do allow rapid relocation of a squad, but that's already possible today. The important thing is to make it easy for the squad to stay together in this big world and not leave people stranded places or have them spend five minutes just getting back to their squad. |
||
|
2012-10-17, 12:39 PM | [Ignore Me] #19 | |||
|
||||
|
2012-10-17, 05:02 PM | [Ignore Me] #21 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
7, 11 if you count the other empires.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
__________________
"There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."
-Douglas Adams |
||
|
2012-10-17, 05:26 PM | [Ignore Me] #22 | |||
Master Sergeant
|
Excellent! It's awesome that they recognize this point because it ups the scale. You can be fighting for continents on a planet, rather than the highest level just being fighting for bases on a continent. I'm not as fussed about the incentives themselves as long as they're there and worth fighting over. % health buff is a common one, but that's just off the top of my head. It's desperately important they're balanced though or else everyone will flood to the continent with the best incentive. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|