Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Cancer sucks!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2004-12-29, 04:19 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
The below is all written by banned forum member "Dharkbayne".
First off, Yes, Netarun is Dhark. You shouldn't base your actions on that, though, because you didn't know that at the time of the ban, or any time until now. All I did was hold a small experiment, to see if the moderation of PSU *was* really killing the forums, and yes, it is. None of these problems would have happened if A. You had a FAQ intricatly describing *ALL OF THE RULES*, not just some and having "unwritten" rules that you're supposed to "pick up on", since newbies obviously would not pick up on these right away. This also removes room to argue, because you can just say "Read the fucking FAQ you retard. You broke a rule, you should've read it. B. Had sent a warning to Netarun via PM, because he would have no idea what rules he had broken. C. Actually utilized the 3 strike rule. You shouldn't just randomly use a rule, because that makes moderation confusing. You should list reasons that cause the 3 strike rule to go into effect, and what means a permaban, instead of seemingly doing it random, or just always use the 3 strike rule. D. Have a list of bans, and the reason like they were banned, who banned them, a link to the posts that caused the ban, and when. SomethingAwful has a good example of this, which you can see here: http://forums.somethingawful.com/banlist.php , because if people don't know WHY they were banned, how do they know what rules they are breaking? E. Not practice elitist moderation. This means that trolls like Squeeky should be outright banned for shit like that. The thread that netarun posted had a good cause, was not spam, and wasn't breaking any rules at the time of the posting. F. Stop fucking IP banning me. It's not gonna stop me, I can change my IP, or if I'm lazy, I can use a proxy. All it does is waste my time. G. Stop with all the "Worship me or you're banned" stuff. Even jokingly, it scares newbies. All it does is promote a sense of fear. People should not have to fear the admin unless they're breaking rules. This doesn't mean insults toward the staff shouldn't be bannable. There's a difference between arguing with someone's decision and just being a dick. H. Ban AOL speak, and shitty grammar. It'd create a much cleaner and easier to read forum. I. Ban 1 smiley/1 word replies. They don't add anything to the conversation, and they're just spam. J. Actually ban spammers and idiots. You don't. You ban the wrong people half the time. I. Ban the [tags], they're stupid looking. If you did those, said forums would be much cleaner and nicer places to be in. But I know you won't because you could never agree with anything "that troll x 500" says, because you have a superiority complex and are the most stubborn person I have ever seen.
__________________
oh hey, what's going on? Last edited by Mag; 2004-12-29 at 04:23 PM. |
||
|
2004-12-29, 04:23 PM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
Major
|
...well said, Dhark.
Hamma, you may have banned Dhark but you have to realize he is right about a few things. A few. Because he's banned doesn't mean you shouldn't take his suggestions - i think it's most important to listen to people who have been banned. I understand it's your forum and if we don't like it we can beat it but that isn't a final excuse. We should ease up a bit. And I mean everyone, including me.
__________________
Doop Last edited by Doop; 2004-12-29 at 04:25 PM. |
||
|
2004-12-29, 04:23 PM | [Ignore Me] #3 | ||
1. Dharkbayne was banned. He's had plenty of people post stupid shit like this for him, it's getting old.
2. I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so. netarun = dharkbayne. 3. PSU != SA. Stop trying to make it that way, especially from the grave Dhark. Idiots |
|||
|
2004-12-29, 04:24 PM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
You are truely the one shining beam of light in PSU Squeeky.
By the way, Dhark never told you he was netarun. You had no fucking clue. Besides, I'd rather have PSU be SA than Genmay.
__________________
oh hey, what's going on? Last edited by Mag; 2004-12-29 at 04:25 PM. |
||
|
2004-12-29, 04:25 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | |||
Well thanks snickerdoodle
(12:52:16) BalognaChicken: rofl, well my ip changes so he can keep trying. and if you havent figured it out, im netarun Last edited by Squeeky; 2004-12-29 at 04:28 PM. |
||||
|
2004-12-29, 04:29 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||
Lightbulb Collector
|
In before the delete.
__________________
The gun katas. Through analysis of thousands of recorded gunfights, the Cleric has determined that the geometric distribution of antagonists in any gun battle is a statistically predictable element. The gun kata treats the gun as a total weapon, each fluid position representing a maximum kill zone, inflicting maximum damage on the maximum number of opponents while keeping the defender clear of the statistically traditional trajectories of return fire. By the rote mastery of this art, your firing efficiency will rise by no less than 120%. The difference of a 63% increase to lethal proficiency makes the master of the gun katas an adversary not to be taken lightly. |
||
|
2004-12-29, 04:30 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | |||
Lieutenant General
|
[Wednesday 12.29.2004|17:25:36] INTERNET GORDON FREEMAN - SERIOUS BUSINESS: no [Wednesday 12.29.2004|17:25:39] INTERNET GORDON FREEMAN - SERIOUS BUSINESS: he was just guessing [Wednesday 12.29.2004|17:25:54] INTERNET GORDON FREEMAN - SERIOUS BUSINESS: I told him he was a dick for being a jerk on that thread, but I never actually said I was netarun are you sure?
__________________
|
|||
|
2004-12-29, 04:31 PM | [Ignore Me] #13 | |||
|
||||
|
2004-12-29, 04:33 PM | [Ignore Me] #15 | |||
Lightbulb Collector
|
__________________
The gun katas. Through analysis of thousands of recorded gunfights, the Cleric has determined that the geometric distribution of antagonists in any gun battle is a statistically predictable element. The gun kata treats the gun as a total weapon, each fluid position representing a maximum kill zone, inflicting maximum damage on the maximum number of opponents while keeping the defender clear of the statistically traditional trajectories of return fire. By the rote mastery of this art, your firing efficiency will rise by no less than 120%. The difference of a 63% increase to lethal proficiency makes the master of the gun katas an adversary not to be taken lightly. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|