Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: A land where Hamma's talk and SpreadSheets walk
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2004-02-14, 12:43 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | |||
Major
|
Well from what is happening to the TR with the upcoming changes. I think I'm dropping my char with Uni-MAX. Ok here it comes get ready.
Then locked down it has a 12%faster TTK on an agile and 2% Faster on a Rexo. Not much of an advantage to becoming completely immobile. I didn't really compare to the ScatMax Last edited by JakeLogan; 2004-02-14 at 02:40 PM. |
|||
|
2004-02-14, 01:25 PM | [Ignore Me] #3 | ||
Corporal
|
The TR are the inferior faction!! The NC and VS were formaly TR So they know everything about the TR and their weapons, so obviosly they would make better weapons to beat the TR, duh.
IMO anyway, don't flame
__________________
Strong are the Darkest Ones I'd Sooner Laugh with the Sinners then Cry with the Saints Last edited by SpunkJackel; 2004-02-14 at 01:28 PM. |
||
|
2004-02-14, 02:09 PM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Major
|
This game isn't a MMORPG it's a MMOFPS the story is just put there so its not here is a gun go kill something. So therefore teams should be equal on some level. and its bullshit that TR MAXes have to be immobile to be equal or as some of you say *slightly* stronger than other faction maxes.
Last edited by JakeLogan; 2004-02-14 at 02:25 PM. |
||
|
2004-02-14, 02:41 PM | [Ignore Me] #5 | ||
I've always thought it unusual that the TR MAX special ability has a big negative side-effect, and is required to bring their firepower up to the level of the other MAXs when they're completely mobile. They need to completely sacrifice movement and some degree of turning capacity just to be as good as the other MAXs.
|
|||
|
2004-02-14, 03:22 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
This game is not story driven, it's player driven and I just tested the new MAXes and I'm throughly dissappointed with the Pounders new AV damage, it takes about 10 shots to kill a Basilisk and a little over a full clip to kill a lightning. Thats terrible.
__________________
xSilverLord
DARK, VS, old sig ^_^ |
||
|
2004-02-14, 03:26 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||
Corporal
|
You guys know that Sony is completely incompetent right?
Serously, the pounder started out as AV and the DC as AI...then they changed it as they found the pounder was more effective against infantry....now they change them back...man, what a fcken waste of time.
__________________
Strong are the Darkest Ones I'd Sooner Laugh with the Sinners then Cry with the Saints |
||
|
2004-02-14, 03:32 PM | [Ignore Me] #8 | |||
Major
|
|
|||
|
2004-02-14, 04:35 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | |||
Major
|
|
|||
|
2004-02-14, 06:19 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
Master Sergeant
|
yea, they never really mentioned that the pounder was getting a RoF reduction, it needs to shoot just a bit closer to what it was changed to last B-pass, instead of 3x faster, only 2x faster, and a magazine of 50 instead of 30 and then it would be at the right wavelength
__________________
|
||
|
2004-02-14, 06:33 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | |||
|
||||
|
2004-02-14, 09:34 PM | [Ignore Me] #13 | |||
Corporal
|
|
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|