|
Originally Posted by Kam
Well, they did have more armor on two of thier models but the king tiger was the most powerful overall. And they were reliable, the only tanks that sucked were the sherman and the british tanks.
|
British tanks only fault was the lack of firepower. They had superior armour.
The one consistant philosophy of British tank design post 1940 was Armour, Armour, Armour. and a ignorance glance at everything else....
The average thickness of British tank armour was 160mm, al lthat means was that they took alittle longer to be completely destroyed....
As for the IS-2, what size armament did the King Tiger have? was it bigger then a 122mm?
2004-06-10, 07:42 AM
Linear Mode
