Poll: No more sanctuary? - Page 3 - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: Batteries not included
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

View Poll Results: Sanc or no Sanc
Sanc 32 49.23%
No Sanc 20 30.77%
Moon pie and RC cola. (IE you don't have an opinion) 13 20.00%
Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2011-08-14, 01:15 PM   [Ignore Me] #31
Lartnev
Contributor
Brigadier General
 
Lartnev's Avatar
 
Re: Poll: No more sanctuary?


I voted yes but I wouldn't care if it's a separate continent or just somewhere you can go (the uncappable section probably) to chill out in between fights, have access to VR, chat with outfit etc. In other words I accept the reasons the devs have given (slows down entry involvement in the game etc) but I would like to be able to go there by choice.
Lartnev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-08-15, 12:04 AM   [Ignore Me] #32
Graywolves
General
 
Graywolves's Avatar
 
Re: Poll: No more sanctuary?


Having a place that feels like home just feels good. A place that's safe and where you can chill.

I remember using Sanctuaries for gathering the outfit and staging operations, for training, and for planning.

You can't cram players of this scale on a beachhead or peninsula and expect these areas to serve as staging points when the enemy is camping outside a short distance away.


I don't care if people can never see the sanctuary in years of gameplay but for organisation purposes we need a location to plan and gather.
Graywolves is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-08-15, 12:36 AM   [Ignore Me] #33
EASyEightyEight
Sergeant Major
 
Re: Poll: No more sanctuary?


Originally Posted by Graywolves View Post
I don't care if people can never see the sanctuary in years of gameplay but for organisation purposes we need a location to plan and gather.
Like the footholds? If they're even as small as one hart center, I think we'll be fine. Massing troops in the footholds saves everyone a loading screen, and any risk of pop-lock screwing a raid over at that too. If there are bad guys sitting right outside of the shield, well... they'd be there if one had warped in from a sanctuary too. I think the message being sent is to go somewhere else at this point, really.

Sancs really were just a hub in the grand scheme of things. People are resisting change more than they're resisting losing the sanc. Why not move that hub to each continent and cut out that waste of hard drive space entirely?
EASyEightyEight is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-08-15, 12:42 AM   [Ignore Me] #34
Zulthus
Colonel
 
Zulthus's Avatar
 
Re: Poll: No more sanctuary?


Sancs were needed in PS1 because there wasn't really any other place to stage massive raids. Since everyone spawned there by default on login, they would be able to join in right away, as opposed to a raid being formed at say, Neit. How would anyone know where it was? I think that sancs need to stay, especially since you are able to choose your spawn location.

Also, these uncaps, all we know right now is that you can't capture them. What if there is no shield defending it? Where will raids be formed then?
Zulthus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-08-15, 12:55 AM   [Ignore Me] #35
Graywolves
General
 
Graywolves's Avatar
 
Re: Poll: No more sanctuary?


Originally Posted by EASyEightyEight View Post
Like the footholds? If they're even as small as one hart center, I think we'll be fine. Massing troops in the footholds saves everyone a loading screen, and any risk of pop-lock screwing a raid over at that too. If there are bad guys sitting right outside of the shield, well... they'd be there if one had warped in from a sanctuary too. I think the message being sent is to go somewhere else at this point, really.

Sancs really were just a hub in the grand scheme of things. People are resisting change more than they're resisting losing the sanc. Why not move that hub to each continent and cut out that waste of hard drive space entirely?

I remember over 50 people gathering on the steps of the HART Building. It was completley cramped without other people floating around.

But I do partially want to keep the Sanctuaries for sentimental reasons.
Graywolves is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-08-15, 01:57 PM   [Ignore Me] #36
Baneblade
Contributor
Lieutenant General
 
Baneblade's Avatar
 
Re: Poll: No more sanctuary?


The Sanc took too much out of the game, though I am curious how SOE plans to handle a completely defeated empire.
__________________
Post at me bro.

Baneblade is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-08-15, 02:59 PM   [Ignore Me] #37
Zulthus
Colonel
 
Zulthus's Avatar
 
Re: Poll: No more sanctuary?


Originally Posted by Sobekeus View Post
The Sanc took too much out of the game, though I am curious how SOE plans to handle a completely defeated empire.
How did it take anything out of the game? It was a convenience that allowed the staging of massive raids, or just a place to AFK/look over your certs. Making it slow to get into battle isn't an argument either, it takes literally less than 30 seconds to fly out, or 10 seconds to instant action to a battle.
Zulthus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-08-17, 11:00 AM   [Ignore Me] #38
Atuday
Master Sergeant
 
Re: Poll: No more sanctuary?


Originally Posted by Zulthus View Post
How did it take anything out of the game? It was a convenience that allowed the staging of massive raids, or just a place to AFK/look over your certs. Making it slow to get into battle isn't an argument either, it takes literally less than 30 seconds to fly out, or 10 seconds to instant action to a battle.
I'm with you there. Then again you could wait up to 5 min's for a hart drop. I think it would be better if hart timer was shortened to say... nothing. Also I miss the good old days of having a massive battle going one way and then drop pod swarm comes down from the sky raining troops and death on foes. I hope that comes back in some way other than squad spawning. The power to drop behind enemy lines is great indeed.
Atuday is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-08-17, 11:27 AM   [Ignore Me] #39
FastAndFree
Contributor
Major
 
FastAndFree's Avatar
 
Re: Poll: No more sanctuary?


Smedley said that Planetside 2 will launch with a single continent - could that be the real reason why the sanc was removed?

And could this mean it will return later?
__________________
FastAndFree is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-08-17, 12:00 PM   [Ignore Me] #40
Logit
Second Lieutenant
 
Logit's Avatar
 
Re: Poll: No more sanctuary?


Originally Posted by FastAndFree View Post
Smedley said that Planetside 2 will launch with a single continent - could that be the real reason why the sanc was removed?

And could this mean it will return later?
There is always the possibility that anything will return later.

However, the reasoning they have for removing it was because they felt it slowed down game play.
Logit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-08-17, 02:31 PM   [Ignore Me] #41
Hamma
PSU Admin
 
Hamma's Avatar
 
Re: Poll: No more sanctuary?


I doubt that it would return later.
__________________

PlanetSide Universe - Administrator / Site Owner - Contact @ PSU
Hamma Time - Evil Ranting Admin - DragonWolves - Commanding Officer
Hamma is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.