There is no end game, but heres an idea

[Meriv]

-deleted post-

[Baneblade]

Originally Posted by Pepsi

Be careful, people could use this to pick the perfect server for their empire. Nobody wants to join a server where they know their empire has a history of losing, and at the same time the winning empire on that same server is completely full with players. So the losing team will always have less/worse players and the winners keep on winning.

That is true, and there is a simple and elegant fix: For each EVP ahead you get, the other factions get 1% XP/Resource bonus.

So:

5 - NC = +0%
3 - TR = +2%
1 - VS = +7%

Doesn't punish victory, but helps the loser enough to keep them relatively balanced. If one of them gets to 20%, things will no doubt correct themselves naturally, as people won't like the idea of BR 40 VS players while they are still choking on BR 20.

[Zhane]

I think I'm in the minority but I would love to see victory conditions in PS2. If one side were to manage to take over the entire world, reset the entire map to neutral and give them some kind of reward. I don't see why there would be any problem with that, and it gives players something to work for.

[Phellix]

Originally Posted by Zhane

I think I'm in the minority but I would love to see victory conditions in PS2. If one side were to manage to take over the entire world, reset the entire map to neutral and give them some kind of reward. I don't see why there would be any problem with that, and it gives players something to work for.

There's 3 starting continents with no linking system as far as i'm aware with no sanctuary. I doubt there will ever be a time where all 3 are controlled by an empire, and you shouldn't be rewarded for capping just 1, that would be retarded.