Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: This one time, I was with some guys, on a boat...
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2014-07-01, 05:12 AM | [Ignore Me] #16 | ||
Sergeant Major
|
From what I hear though resource revamp is just going to make 1 universal resource pool so surely that would make it worse as people who lock conts could just spam EVERYTHING easily.
Even if they are going to change it soon till they do they should just remove the resource bonus and make it all a exp boost or something, its not good giving a strength boost to the side thats winning already. |
||
|
2014-07-02, 01:30 AM | [Ignore Me] #17 | |||
Private
|
|
|||
|
2014-07-02, 06:15 AM | [Ignore Me] #18 | |||
Lieutenant General
|
You score points in COD, i.e. you are effective at killing, then you get rewards. The stronger rewards are for when you score more points, i.e. kill more and these awards allow you to become more dominant (radar jamming, gunships overhead, missile strike, etc). He's right in that sense. However, his comparison falls a bit flat, because being assigned gear in PS2 works a bit different (empire based, rather than personal based. The analogy however, intends to state that the winning empire gets a bonus and thus can become more dominant, is true. If you compare it to Mario Kart, then you'll notice that the weakest player gets the strongest bonus. In games like CoD, winning is rewarded instead. Last edited by Figment; 2014-07-02 at 06:25 AM. |
|||
|
2014-07-02, 06:21 AM | [Ignore Me] #20 | ||
Sergeant Major
|
Just report him, hes just trolling the thread, hell that last post he basically said "I don't care if you have 100% proof you are right I say your wrong so you are". Throw in the random insults and its obvious he just wants to troll and derail the thread.
|
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|