Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: This Quote Cost Me $100
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2011-06-30, 03:01 AM | [Ignore Me] #17 | ||
First Sergeant
|
So what happens to sniping?
I suppose it's limited to REXO if agile isn't allowed to carry the larger weapons. I suppose it wouldn't be a disaster, but I did enjoy my air cav II + med assault/sniping to perfectly fit my 11 reserve certs. The 11 cert limit wouldn't specifically be a problem in PS 2, but I'm sure I'd have better things to pay for than 8 certs to snipe, and also not being able to fly while doing so. Also, what happens to the glue gun? That being said, I do like the idea of taking large slots off agile, I just can't see a scenario where someone would cert sniping over HA or AV. Perhaps a different method of limiting what a soldier can carry: weight. AV and HA weapons just weigh too much for the agile suit's holster, but a sniper rifle or glue gun, while still taking up a large slot, don't weigh too much to carry. This would allow the devs to tweak the weights of the individual guns to determine whether they can be used by soldiers. |
||
|
2011-06-30, 07:28 AM | [Ignore Me] #18 | |||
Colonel
|
I can only imagine this in relation to the original Planetside, but restricting snipers to rexo would not only kill my beloved tree sniping, but make field sniping torturous as well. |
|||
|
2011-06-30, 09:40 AM | [Ignore Me] #19 | |||
|
||||
|
2011-06-30, 11:53 AM | [Ignore Me] #20 | |||
Major
|
actually thats a lie, i used to have AV certed instead of the lasher on my VS toon, but thats when the lancer was a laser sniper rifle.... and that was just fun as hell |
|||
|
2011-06-30, 12:46 PM | [Ignore Me] #21 | |||
Brigadier General
|
I just like the OP idea because it adds a layer of customization while not looking too complicated. However who knows how they will deal with inventory in the sequel. |
|||
|
2011-06-30, 04:59 PM | [Ignore Me] #22 | ||
First Sergeant
|
I'm just going to raise a point that has been oddly overlooked.
If you're in the middle of a goddamn WAR, should you really be looking in the guy's backpack for goodies while bullets are flying all around you? There's a certain amount of situational awareness that should be expected from people. It's called common sense. Don't loot a backpack if the lead is flying. And if a guy comes around a corner unexpectedly? Well that's just bad luck. Unless of course you want to just walk over stuff and pick it up automatically. |
||
|
2011-06-30, 06:12 PM | [Ignore Me] #23 | |||
Brigadier General
|
1) Stand there and look pretty 2) Run headlong into the enemy lines with just my knife. 3) Pick up ammo laying on the ground, reload, and fire. Call me an idiot, but I've done them all and option #3 looks the best to me. |
|||
|
2011-06-30, 07:17 PM | [Ignore Me] #24 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
By that reasoning you could use MA to take on the squishies. Then cert AV. Cause av works on vehicles but your ap ammo doesnt....well it does but you need 5000 rounds to do anything. And you can kill a max with av, and you can do it with AP ammo but 95% chance you are dead that way. MA fills the squishie killing role FAR better than AP ammo fills the AV role.
|
||
|
2011-07-01, 01:46 PM | [Ignore Me] #25 | |||
First Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
2011-07-01, 02:02 PM | [Ignore Me] #26 | ||
Brigadier General
|
Well yeah, if you happen to be nearby. Generally, by the time I run out of ammo, I've advanced far enough away from a terminal where it would be alot faster to just die and respawn than it would be to run alllll the way back.
|
||
|
2011-07-01, 03:24 PM | [Ignore Me] #27 | ||||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
Again HA doesn't let you handle vehicles while AV obviously does. I only cert HA when I get too annoyed at being dominated at close range, and I would never drop AV for it. |
||||
|
2011-07-01, 11:08 PM | [Ignore Me] #28 | |||
Colonel
|
"You cannot enter the cockpit with a Lancer on your back. Please store it in the trunk or discard it" Same for cloaking, tbh.. A restriction saying a cloaking suit can't cloak with a large weapon is sensible. A restriction saying a person in a cloaking suit can't hold a weapon is not. |
|||
|
2011-07-02, 01:24 AM | [Ignore Me] #30 | |||
First Sergeant
|
Dvidd can you explain what you mean by "Just tweak the holster size of the images"? |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Tags |
inventory |
|
|