Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Hey! get away from my coffin!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-07-21, 11:09 AM | [Ignore Me] #19 | ||
Second Lieutenant
|
Read up good sir, there are three turrets available for the lightning: the Skyguard AA, the 100mm Anti-Personnel Turret (which is what we have seen so far), and the lightning tank hunter turret.
http://wiki.planetside-universe.com/ps/Lightning Last edited by Landtank; 2012-07-21 at 11:13 AM. |
||
|
2012-07-21, 11:15 AM | [Ignore Me] #20 | |||
Private
|
|
|||
|
2012-07-21, 11:34 AM | [Ignore Me] #23 | ||
First Sergeant
|
Nah, one is for light vehicles, one is for heavy vehicles and one is for transports. Light vehicles are the lightning and the aircav while heavy are mbt's and liberators. From what we have seen there are no rare resources, however the MBT and the Liberator costs 50% more of their resource than the aircav and lightning so on average you will get fewer of them anyway.
Last edited by Klockan; 2012-07-21 at 11:35 AM. |
||
|
2012-07-21, 12:16 PM | [Ignore Me] #24 | |||
Second Lieutenant
|
Otherwise yeah this is spot on. |
|||
|
2012-07-21, 01:00 PM | [Ignore Me] #25 | ||
Staff Sergeant
|
I really hope they do require tech, and I hope the rest of the bases are built for a purpose like they were in the old Planetside eg: vehicle shields, faster respawn times etc.
It would be nice having a reason to take a specific base rather then taking it simply because its the next in line or the mission system offers more XP for that base. |
||
|
2012-07-21, 06:02 PM | [Ignore Me] #26 | ||
Major
|
It will be interesting to see how the scale of different kinds of battles and skirmishes will favor lightnings or mixed groups of lightnings and driver-only tanks v. solid ranks of fully gunned tanks.
My guess is that during times or areas of low population, lightnings will be effective and the extra armor of MBTs will be a force multiplier. If one side does not have tanks, several extra lightnings can compensate. Lightnings are probably going to be cheaper to run, and faster getting to the fight. During larger battles, I think we are going to favor firepower density from fully gunned tanks. If there are many vehicles on the field, some will have their shots blocked by friendlies in front of them. Ideally, vehicles that do have a clear line of sight will be able to throw the maximum DPS downrange. AA will probably need to be omnipresent, so skyguard lightnings will likely see use all the time. I really hope we can pull gal's from FH™*. *: Foot Hold. Having no mobile spawn points seems like it could be such a huge disadvantage. In PS1, you could not take a tech plant without them (AMS). Last edited by Fenrys; 2012-07-21 at 06:06 PM. |
||
|
2012-07-21, 06:23 PM | [Ignore Me] #27 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
Yeah I'd rather see MBTs be limited to tech plants then Galaxies. Galaxies are probably going to be rare enough without requiring tech plants for their spawn points.
That depends of course on whether or not one can be pulled from the foot holds. If they can then the point becomes... well pointless. Not much point in going for the Tech Plant for the sake of Galaxies if you can pull one from a safe foot hold location and fly it to where you need it. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|