Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: So easy a caveman can do it!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2011-12-14, 10:20 AM | [Ignore Me] #16 | ||
Major
|
The reason for the supression mechanic is to be able to track suppresion as an activity. Its supposed to be a support activity that helps others get the kill and thus if you are suppresing you need XP/kill assists etc to help you progress (and have fun).
With out it there are always better roles you could be taking for support and offense. Its the underpinning of a different (and new to planetside) playstyle. |
||
|
2011-12-14, 11:22 AM | [Ignore Me] #17 | ||
Colonel
|
Funny, they didn't follow that line of reasoning with the Reaver. Also, I noticed, not on topic, that cloakers were armorless and quick, but Phantasms were stupidly fast and stupidly over-armored, undetectable except with interlink, no weapon lock-on of any sort, and no visible splash if you did hit them with a dumb-fired weapon that usually uses lock.
Talk about imbalanced. MAX's are unbalanced because they are stupidly slow. A MAX should be able to mow infantry. It's what it's made for. Not to be mowed by infantry. Having a MAX with a far slower turn rate than a BFR was and is idiotic. As I said, if they want to make the MAX's as slow as they were in PS1, then sure, but five times the armor. And, yeah MAX's are NOT all about suppression, by any means. Could be a nice option, however.
__________________
Bagger 288 |
||
|
2011-12-14, 12:30 PM | [Ignore Me] #18 | ||
Major
|
This would be terrible, supression weapons just stagnate gameplay, plasma splash comes to mind from the first game, just enough damage to stop you moving forward. It's not a fun mechanic for a FPS and certainly not a MMOFPS where you'd be supressed 24/7
__________________
|
||
|
2011-12-14, 01:09 PM | [Ignore Me] #21 | |||
Major
|
Stairwell fights were stupid in PS1 they went on for hours and consisted of throwing nades at walls. LMG's have no role, it either forces you to stay in cover which stagnates gameplay or it does so little damage it's just an annoyance; neither are good game mechanics
__________________
|
|||
|
2011-12-14, 01:27 PM | [Ignore Me] #22 | ||
Contributor PlanetSide 2
Creative Director |
yes, we have proper LMGs. They're the default weapons for Heavy Assault class. HA can take these LMGs or our variants of the classic PS1 HA weapons.
edit: we don't currently have a suppression mechanic, it's pretty annoying in the type of battles that Planetside creates. LMGs are good for other reasons, they have lots of customization options and are really powerful for area denial / cover fire when placed strategically, but a lot less useful for run-and-gun. Last edited by Higby; 2011-12-14 at 01:29 PM. |
||
|
2011-12-14, 01:32 PM | [Ignore Me] #23 | |||
__________________
"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war, and now there ain't no going back. I mean shit, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it! If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight. " Slim Charles aka Tallman - The Wire BRTD Mumble Server powered by Gamercomms |
||||
|
2011-12-14, 01:49 PM | [Ignore Me] #24 | |||
Colonel
|
Any chance of seeing the HAs and MAXes of the remaining factions soon?
__________________
|
|||
|
2011-12-14, 01:51 PM | [Ignore Me] #25 | |||
Major
|
__________________
|
|||
|
2011-12-14, 01:54 PM | [Ignore Me] #27 | |||
Banned
|
I seriously hate artificial crap like that. Suppression should come simply from the fact that a dozen guys are spraying down a hall, not a couple bullets grazing past me and blurring my screen. |
|||
|
2011-12-14, 02:01 PM | [Ignore Me] #28 | ||
Contributor PlanetSide 2
Creative Director |
Theyre not as high-damage as assault rifles per shot, but more designed for auto-fire rather than bursting. Stationary shooters can pick at targets from decent range, but if you're moving around a lot the LMGs are pretty much useless for accuracy and the classic HA weapons are a much better bet. It just depends on how you want to play your HA class. HA is also one of our main AV classes, so theres a ton of versatility in that one.
|
||
|
2011-12-14, 02:10 PM | [Ignore Me] #29 | ||
great new info!
artificial suppression stuff really isn´t needed. the scale of the battles will totally make up for that! i was around at the glorious times of ps1, when several conts were poplocked at once, and trust me, you will not miss suppression mechanics. in ps1 there were about 300 players per cont. this time it may even be thousands. and when 2 zergs hit each other, there will be more than enough natural suppression going on. imagine trying to fight your way into a base that is defended by hundrets of players, a lot of then heavyly fortified and entrenched in strategic places, wielding heavy machineguns and even more aggressive weapons. |
|||
|
2011-12-14, 02:10 PM | [Ignore Me] #30 | |||
Major
|
Can heavy troops equip lighter weapons too? as in could you choose to have heavy armour but an accurate weapon? and do AV troops get a half decent back up AI weapon, ot are they going to be fodder?
__________________
|
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|