Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: You call that a gun?
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2012-07-21, 09:09 PM | [Ignore Me] #16 | ||
Major
|
Almost seems like they went out of their way to get non-vets and people without keys, based on the people I'm hearing getting invites.
Not sure what's up. Maybe they want to make sure everything's up to par before they get the more rabid fans in. I did notice that idiot who posted the youtube video, referred to it as a stress test weekend and made it sound like he wouldn't be seeing the rest of the game. Of course, he was full of misinformation so who knows. Last edited by Sephirex; 2012-07-21 at 09:12 PM. |
||
|
2012-07-21, 09:10 PM | [Ignore Me] #17 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
|
|||
|
2012-07-21, 09:11 PM | [Ignore Me] #19 | ||
Private
|
I think this is all moot. Pretty much every vet I know with a leet computer thats been closely following the game got in by last night. I myself am not included in this list but I expected that due to computer specs. Only know one or two with non 'leet' specs that got in, and even still much better than mine.
__________________
|
||
|
2012-07-21, 09:11 PM | [Ignore Me] #20 | |||
Corporal
|
So basically, we have this small upper-crust of the playerbase who has experience with the series, with First Person Shooters, with balance [more or less], and perhaps most of all, with the frustrations of the first game's shortcomings. If I wanted to create an awesome product, I would seek these people out first, and ask them if the new product was more enjoyable than the last, and invite them to try to break it, because you had better believe those who have little to no love for PS will be the first to attempt to hack and exploit it
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/Radant?feature=mhsn AIM: Radant22 |
|||
|
2012-07-21, 09:13 PM | [Ignore Me] #22 | |||
Honestly, this is getting silly
__________________
|
||||
|
2012-07-21, 09:14 PM | [Ignore Me] #25 | ||
Sergeant
|
I know that was wat you were saying in principal, but posting it on this thread is more like saying it also goes for these cases (non priority getting in before priority). While priority > non-priority is the general offically communicated order of the invites.
Hence if we conclude that it's normal that priority > non-priority : It is strange that they couldn't find the specs in the priority pool, and thus said arguments (OP) are a bit weird. |
||
|
2012-07-21, 09:15 PM | [Ignore Me] #26 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
|
|||
|
2012-07-21, 09:17 PM | [Ignore Me] #27 | ||
Staff Sergeant
|
People have been playing team based online games for more than ten years now, planetside 2 is on a larger scale, but it won't take the average person more than a few minutes to adjust to that.
Playing planetside doesn't make you some kind of special super gamer. Last edited by GhettoPrince; 2012-07-21 at 09:19 PM. |
||
|
2012-07-21, 09:18 PM | [Ignore Me] #28 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
|
|||
|
2012-07-21, 09:21 PM | [Ignore Me] #29 | ||
First Sergeant
|
It was a tech test based on system specs alone. No reason for them to wast their time ensuring that every system not only had the appropriate specs but was also a PS1 vet for such a short test. This wasn't the stage in beta where they said they would start letting in vets. It was solely to test a range of system specs before they started the beta invites. Them giving vets priority is a courtesy as well which they didn't have to do. Beta is to help them develop the game, not to allow you early access. Quit with the QQ, beta will start soon enough.
|
||
|
2012-07-21, 09:22 PM | [Ignore Me] #30 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
1. I dislike making an assumption like the majority being non PS1 vets based on anecdotes. A lot of anecdotes are brought about because (a) of the video by the idiot that's come up a lot in multiple threads and (b) people being upset about it happening at all. You go on to say you know "for a fact" that there are PS1 Vets (not in the Tech Test) with the same system rig, but I don't understand how you can know that for certain, especially when you are basing the majority of your impression on anecdotes. There are of course also regional considerations. 2. Familiarity effects perspective. Just because you think something "should be obvious" doesn't mean it is, nor that it gets the attention it should get even if people are aware of the potential (or actual) issue. If you're familiar with a problem you might not test it as readily, or think it is as important as it may be. I agree that people who are familiar with a system are better able to test things like balance, but different perspectives could help bring into question what mechanisms can be problematic to those who aren't familiar, or even whether or not mechanisms should exist in the first place. And that kind of feedback should occur at a relatively early stage to avoid having more and more balance based on it if it needs to be changed or removed. Ultimately, my second point isn't too important, it just addresses much of your own post. While they are no doubt getting game-play feedback during Tech Test it isn't the reason or focus of the test itself. I would honestly be disappointed as well if SOE didn't pull from Priority lists first and just went at random... and I'm NOT on Priority Lists (I don't even have a Key) but I don't think it's important enough to be a problem, just mildly disappointing that they aren't that well organized. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|