Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: psst... big party at Hamma's house after the show
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2013-06-22, 01:09 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Major General
|
It's just that pay-to-win usually insinuates a negative meaning, especially in a PvP centric game. I think PS2 has done a pretty good job of not making the P2W aspect a negative thing though.
|
||
|
2013-06-22, 03:07 PM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
Staff Sergeant
|
I don't regard P2W as a good or bad thing with respect to for-profit companies. Everyone is entitled to earning a living.
SOE didn't force any one to play PS2, its F2P game. SOE didn't force anyone to spend money while playing its F2P game, PS2. So when SOE gives gamers who DO want to p2Win while playing PS2, SOE has that right and I don't think ill of SOE for doing so. |
||
|
2013-06-22, 04:22 PM | [Ignore Me] #3 | |||
Major General
|
Because, in the end, if you aren't going to make the free-to-play experience enjoyable and in turn drive those players away keeping only the niche players who do pay, you may as well have made the game subscription based. The depth of the game in certain aspects would have been better sub based then. Last edited by Crator; 2013-06-22 at 04:26 PM. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|