Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Stop it! That tickles!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-10-16, 03:45 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Second Lieutenant
|
Well I'll be damned. It looks as though they buffed the Striker, in a sense.
Here's my logic: Previously, it took 4 missiles to kill a MAX. It now takes six. So, previously, a TR with a fully-loaded Striker and 3 boxes of Ammo (a fairly standard loadout, when you get an AI weapon and medkits too) could kill three MAXes. Now, you can still kill the three MAXes, but it uses up 18 out of 20 missiles. They BUFFED the thing, you now have missiles left over. Granted, we have to hold the lock, but in it's new (admittedly nerfed) range the locks seem to come easier. I think on the whole the Striker didn't actually come out of it as bad as I thought it would. Still need to play with it a bit, but the damage potential is still there. |
||
|
2003-10-16, 06:28 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | ||
I think you misread what he was trying to say, Madcow. He saying since it's a tradeoff the TR should have nothing to whine about. This of course will not be the case. In fact just go look at the OF boards if you can stomach them long enough to.
__________________
Happy lil' Elf, now Santa approved. -Immortalis Vita Its eating it's food. (Incorrect use of apostrophes specifically for UV) "Oni wont get banned, unless you get banned. Its a 2 man ticket."-Hamma to TekDragon re: his request to ban Oni. Life is good. |
|||
|
2003-10-16, 06:56 PM | [Ignore Me] #14 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
I swear, time was throwing a winky face into your post would let others know you weren't being completely serious. I didn't actually mis-read the post, I cleverly (or not, apparently) turned it around and referenced the way the whining had just changed sides was all. It was a joke, I promise!
|
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|