Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Now With More Cinnamon
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-10-20, 02:25 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
General
|
Right now my computer stats show as
Intel Celeron Processor 1.2GHz 512 ram 9000 ATI RADEON PRO 128mb i dont know my motherboard and i have a very shitty soundcard Right now I wanna upgrade my processor. Can I expect Planetside to run better on higher graphic settings once I upgrade my processor? Right now I have to run it on low graphics and thats no fun. When I play on medium graphic settings I get lagg when im in heavy battles. Also my friend says inorder to upgrade my processor to say a pentium 4 processor I would need to upgrade my motherboard. PLEASE TELL ME HE'S JOKING! Im thinking of getting a Intel Pentium 4 2.4GHz processor.
__________________
|
||
|
2003-10-20, 02:40 PM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
well yes you do have to get a new MB, your celleron is mostlikey a socket 370 the p4's now are 478(i think, give or take a few pins)
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
2003-10-20, 02:43 PM | [Ignore Me] #3 | ||
General
|
Crap I was afraid of that. So if I stck with Celeron and I upgrade to a better one do I still need to get a new MB? If I use a better Celeron can I still expect better performance for planetside? I hear Pentiums are more for gaming and Celerons are not. True?
__________________
|
||
|
2003-10-20, 03:05 PM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
First Sergeant
|
Yes Pentiums are better for gaming. No you dont need a new Mobo. Upgrading anything for what you have will improve your PS situation, but a Pentium would do the most good and then a gig of ram then vid card.
(Ram and vid are in a close tie really its up to how much cash u have) |
||
|
2003-10-22, 07:32 AM | [Ignore Me] #7 | |||
First Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
2003-10-22, 12:12 PM | [Ignore Me] #8 | ||
First Sergeant
|
Its really just a preference. Besided in my experiences Intel runs windoes more stablally than AMD. If windows crashes any games you were playing crash as well. Thats why I stick with intel. At any rate the discussion looked much more open to Pentium/Celeron than AMD. I might consider an AMD when the 64 OS has been out for 8 months (My normal microsoft cooling time +2 months because its a 64 bit os) because it will more likely than not be benchmarked with an AMD because they released the first 64 bit cpu (Between intel/amd, Sun microsystems has been running 64 bit for years, and solaris 10.0 will be 128 bit along with 128 bit hardware)
|
||
|
2003-10-22, 02:51 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||
Second Lieutenant
|
Wow, i haven't seen so much bad info and market paranoia in a long time.
As for the original subject, Rbstr was right. You are more than likely looking at a MB upgrade to seriously upgrade your processor. Your 1.2 Celeron is based off a P3 core and you prolly have an 815E mb chipset. Its 100mhz fsb. The only Celeron's you can interchange with it will be the 1.3 or 1.4 Celeron's. Anything higher is based off a P4 core, will be 400+ mhz, and require a newer mb chipset. Download CPUID or something also to figure out what you got for sure. You can possibly put a normal P3 1.4 chip in. It will defintely be a little better than your celeron. But you can't go sticking in a P4. As for Intel vs AMD, the days of I don't like AMD's b/c of (insert urban legend of choice) are long gone. They don't have heat problems, they don't crash or have function errors anymore than Intels, etc. If a chip is not stable, its not put out. Last time I can seriously remember a chip with math errors, was guess what, an Intel. These days the MB chipset and ram play a much bigger role in system stability than the actual processor. |
||
|
2003-10-23, 09:20 AM | [Ignore Me] #12 | ||
Second Lieutenant
|
What do you mean, he has a P3 mb. How do you figure you can put a P4 core celeron in a P3 mb? Your missing about 300mhz fsb that the chipset can't handle. And the memory is prolly all wrong, I am sure his MB only supports SDRAM. Not even RDRAM prolly.
Last edited by Daleon; 2003-10-23 at 10:54 PM. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|