Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Where purple isn't really a "summer" color.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
View Poll Results: Who has priority in tower capture? | |||
Vehicles should cease fire for infantry. | 11 | 47.83% | |
Infantry should wait for the vehicles to stop. | 1 | 4.35% | |
Infantry enters at its own risk. I want kills! | 0 | 0% | |
Vehicles get grief at their own risk. I want kills! | 1 | 4.35% | |
I stay away from towers cuz of this crap. | 1 | 4.35% | |
Both are important; everyone should be more careful. | 9 | 39.13% | |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-10-28, 01:40 AM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
After being TK'd a few times just trying to capture one tower by people in vehicles, I was just wondering what everyone thought of these sorts of dilemmas.
Who has priority when it comes to the tower? Should the vehicles stop firing to give way to the infantry so they can capture the tower? Or should infantry just let the vehicles spam for a while? |
||
|
2003-10-28, 01:48 AM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
I think it's best for the vehicles to shellshock the guys in the tower first, for a few minutes, then rush all the infantry inside in waves. Then again, it's fairly hard to get the point across to everyone else with nothing but chat, so my view is that infantry have priority, vehicles are only there for containment and harrasment, Infantry are the ones that take the tower.
__________________
{BOHICA} |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|