Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Hammer for Jesus 2012.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-11-27, 06:20 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Private
|
I got 512Mb pc2700 RAM how big a diffrence (FPS) does it make if i get 512more?
Also!!!! I'm thinking 'bout upgrading bits and pieces of my pc, something like a P4 2.8GHz. is it worth spending money on faster ram, like pc3200??? even if i got a Gb pc2700!? |
||
|
2003-11-27, 06:32 PM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
if you get a p4 800mhz FSB yes it is worth it because a P4 makes much better useage of memory bandwith. And if you were to use that memory with the P4 it would be out of sink with the FSB so it would lead to preformance losses. rember you will ne a new Mobo to if you get a p4.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
2003-11-29, 12:38 AM | [Ignore Me] #8 | ||
NO the graphis card is nothing if you have a crappy system, i should know, this card runs very well in 3dmark and other mostly Card based test but in CPU, Memory bandwith, and HDD benches it can't hold its own. But it aslo works the other way, if you have the ultimate sytem and a ATI Rage Fury Maxx you will get screwed too. The best hing to do is choose a price range and pick products that fit in, then take whatever is left over and upgrade the things that you can.
oh and i'm fixing my comps problems, having learned my lesson, geting memory, an Audigy card, 2 Raptor Hd's and a new processor within a year, thankyou gods of good fortune.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
2003-11-29, 03:18 PM | [Ignore Me] #9 | ||
which dont play as big a factor in gaming. look if your cpu is meeting the minimum requirments then the gfx card is where its at. now depending on how much ram you have your load times in games will vary but all in all your FPS and determined mostly by the gfx card.
|
|||
|
2003-11-29, 03:23 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||
I would bet that if you used a p3 1 ghz like the min requirements say with a rady 9800xt you would get max of 20 fps in PS.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
2003-11-29, 10:35 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | ||
man your right in UT 2003 I'd only get 98 fps and only 132 in QIII definatly not playable...
now I dont know what they would be in PS I'd imagine much lower because PS is a friggen hog. even the top machines dont make it fly. I got my info from http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/200...charts-21.html and yes the numbers go up dramaticlly but im sure he's not running an old PIII 1ghz.... so invest in that gfx card. (unless you only play PS, then you need to jsut buy a whole new computer ) |
|||
|
2003-12-01, 03:13 AM | [Ignore Me] #14 | ||
yea and were not talking about maknig that kind of jump here. he wants to go from a 2100 to a 2.8 intel or somthing... not that big of a difference. (excluding the QIII chart because that game has no bearing anymore)
ofcourse all tihs is really a moot point because he already has a kick ass gfx card. but I still stand that spending 300 bucks on a 9800 pro is better than spending 300+ bucks on a 2.8 intel set up. |
|||
|
2003-12-01, 07:35 AM | [Ignore Me] #15 | |||
And OMA, if his card has as much memory as his comp ITS NOT A GOOD THING! Last edited by Ait'al; 2003-12-01 at 07:38 AM. |
||||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|