:O (warning 56k ers)

Biohazzard56 · 2003-12-25, 12:16 PM

Screenies speak for themselves

DeMiNe0 · 2003-12-25, 12:43 PM

game?

Neon Apocalypse · 2003-12-25, 01:08 PM

yeah thats nice but i doubt it could handle them moving, as it only got 40 fps

Corrosion · 2003-12-25, 01:23 PM

i just creamed my pants.

Indecisive · 2003-12-25, 01:24 PM

Originally Posted by Neon Apocalypse

yeah thats nice but i doubt it could handle them moving, as it only got 40 fps

Neon Apocalypse · 2003-12-25, 02:08 PM

Dharkbayne · 2003-12-25, 07:41 PM

:drool:

Ait'al · 2003-12-25, 07:43 PM

I spiteth on your warnings!

Edit: pic just loaded!

Corrosion · 2003-12-25, 07:46 PM

Originally Posted by Ait'al

I spiteth on your warnings!

you never make ANY sense

Squick · 2003-12-25, 07:48 PM

I like the ferrie demo that comes with the nVidia FX cards

And truthfully, that does not look any better then the end scene of 3dMark 2001, with the wood-floored room and pond in the middle, with waves going back and forth, and the reflections being accurately reproduced in moving water.

I'm guessing that is using pixel shaders though right? It is very wastefull to do pixel shaders on something like metal, when there are existing DX8 texture shaders that can accurately represent glossy metal reflections at 1/100th the processing power.

And the chrome on the wheels looks like poo...

Ait'al · 2003-12-25, 07:56 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by Ait'al

I spiteth on your warnings!

you never make ANY sense

IM known to have a 56k modem and it was right after i said somthing on irc about me not being able to load stuff seomweaks ago that he started putting the 56kwarning on his threads 8) lol or did it again, i dont know which.

damnit i want that car!!!

hes right about the chrome though especially on hte tailpipe. And the mirrors angle isnt realistic. 8) but the lighting reflectin on its surface are awesome!