Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: The damn wraith cloaked again! I can't find it!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
View Poll Results: Do you want to see empire specific aircraft | |||
Yes i do want to see empire specific aircraft | 24 | 80.00% | |
No i dont want to see empire specific aircraft | 5 | 16.67% | |
I don't care either way | 1 | 3.33% | |
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2004-02-17, 01:02 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Empire Specific Aircraft We all know that each empire has its own trademark sort of weaponry; this includes a Tank, Buggy, Medium Assault, Heavy Assault and Anti Vehicular. This is all fine and dandy but why doesn�t each empire have its own trademark Aircraft. It would seem logical that we would have one. Would you like to see Empire Specific Aircraft? |
|||
|
2004-02-17, 01:05 PM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
Colonel
|
No, sorry. In a perfect world, however, I would say yes in a heartbeat. The problem is, if the Devs accidentally made one Empire's Air more powerful than the rest, then that Empire would have complete control of the skies. And while I'm going to get flamed for saying this, that would make that Air vehicle more unbalancing than the Jackhammer. Air is simply too effective at creating chokepoints and hit-and-run raids to give one Empire superiority.
|
||
|
2004-02-17, 01:06 PM | [Ignore Me] #3 | ||
The idea is ok, but air superiority is so significant that I think this might be the most contested balance issue of them all, and that spells trouble.
Otherwise, not a bad idea.
__________________
"Blessed are the Peacemakers, for they shall be called Sons and Daughters of God." - Jesus Christ "Blessed are those who Hunger and Thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied." - Jesus Christ PlanetSide player, retired |
|||
|
2004-02-17, 01:17 PM | [Ignore Me] #5 | ||
I can see how people would think that if there were empire specific aircraft then that would lead to air superiority but that�s why we have the Skyguard. That thing will rip up any aircraft and when I do get the chance to play I don�t see it being used that often. So to sum this up I don�t think that adding empire specific aircraft would create the dilemma of air superiority if we used the Skyguard and the AA Max�s more proficiently.
|
|||
|
2004-02-17, 01:59 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
Colonel
|
Hmmm, that point deserves thinking upon... Not. *Starts talking like a kindergarten teacher* Now, wouldn;t it just be fun to not be able to go outside, for fear of getting smushed or spammed ? Wouldn't it just be great to never capture a single base becuase your infantry blew chunks ? I though so .
|
||
|
2004-02-17, 02:45 PM | [Ignore Me] #13 | |||
First Lieutenant
|
Besides if the devs hold true to form with any empire specific aircraft the TR will keep the Skeeter and Reaver. The VS will get faster versions of both that will look weird and be strangely ineffective. And the NC will get a Winged Triple Barreled Flail, that can rapid fire or �empty all 3 barrels�. No Thanks.
__________________
Last edited by BadAsh; 2004-02-17 at 02:48 PM. |
|||
|
2004-02-17, 02:59 PM | [Ignore Me] #14 | ||
Lieutenant General
|
Now I would LOVE some empire specific Weaponry but, if they added this, they would have to add another AA tool to the game. Just like they can't add more vehicles unless they add AV support. When they added the Lib, they added the Skygaurd, something to benefit both sides. Bottom line, I don't thnk I would want more AA.
|
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|