Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Rejecting quotes like this since '03
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
View Poll Results: What forms of guidance do you want in(multiple choice)? | |||
None | 8 | 21.05% | |
Wire guided | 23 | 60.53% | |
Lock on | 12 | 31.58% | |
Lock on only as an infantry AA. | 15 | 39.47% | |
Remote guided | 18 | 47.37% | |
other | 2 | 5.26% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2011-07-23, 08:49 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Colonel
|
How do you guys feel about guided weapons?
My thoughts.. Lock-on weapons: Totally brainless operation. Place reticle vaguely over target, wait for tone, fire. The one place I could see this working is infantry AA, which by its nature wouldn't be very believable with a flak or high rate of fire weapon, but even then a high maneuverability wire guided missile with a flak warhead would be preferable. Wire guided: These are fun and take some skill to use. They still make hits at range easier, but they scale damage naturally with range since each missile must be guided in individually. They also afford the possibility of skilled users hitting just behind obstacles. Remote guided: Too cheap, too easy. Able to shoot while safely behind cover, oftentimes even inside. |
||
|
2011-07-23, 08:58 PM | [Ignore Me] #3 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
The lock on that the striker used was fine. You had to maintain the lock so it took some effort and it had a nice back and forth play between the user and the target.
Fire and forget lock on tho would be terrible, easy and lame and boring. Guided is bad too. Take the phoenix, you can hide inside behind base walls, inside a building and fire out the door, top of towers where only air can get to you. You can also hit targets who take cover, those over hills and behind objects. Even if they cant hit you. There is no back and forth, the gameplay it presents is just bad. I would rather have BFR's than phoenix type weapons. Now if the guided ones were common pool and vastly weaker damage per second average, but had the guided advantage as an upside. Then they could be used to take out some things that are out of line of sight, but would be crap for takin out vehicles via cheap means like the phoenix does. Although i would rather just not have em at all personally. |
||
|
2011-07-23, 10:02 PM | [Ignore Me] #5 | |||
Brigadier General
|
Anyways, for the poll, I voted for just about all of the above. They can all be balanced into the game. |
|||
|
2011-07-23, 10:23 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | |||
Colonel
|
I say all guided stuff should be kept. It works. This is especially true if the flight ceiling is raised. |
|||
|
2011-07-23, 10:36 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||||
Staff Sergeant
|
Boo hoo I can shoot people from around terrain boo hoo |
||||
|
2011-07-23, 10:46 PM | [Ignore Me] #9 | |||
Staff Sergeant
|
I think it basically takes someone who has been on the receiving end of never ending phoenix spam to understand how fucking annoying that thing was. Me thinks it will only be NC defending it. |
|||
|
2011-07-23, 10:55 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | |||
Colonel
|
As a VS player I find our lancer to be much more annoying probably. I shoot planes out of the air all the time when they fly into attack something. |
|||
|
2011-07-23, 11:09 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | |||
Major
|
The Lancer is really what made PS for me. I really enjoyed engaging vehicles from long range and consistently hitting them with the Lancer. If the Lancer isn't present in PS2 I will be very, very, very displeased. I know that the devs occasionally lurk these boards. If you mess with the Lancer I might actually have to kill you. Off topic: I've noticed in the trailer that nobody is carrying two weapons on their back? Some may have a Jetpack, but no second weapon in the "rifle" slot. What gives? Are we limited to only one main weapon this time around? |
|||
|
2011-07-23, 11:11 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | |||
Staff Sergeant
|
As a tank driver/gunner the fact that I would literally have to charge into enemy lines to even get at shot at the people nailing me isn't fun or balanced. |
|||
|
2011-07-23, 11:12 PM | [Ignore Me] #13 | |||
Lieutenant General
|
Off topic: I really hope it's just because it's the first teaser. All they seemed to have done in that teaser were three weapons. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|