Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: YELLOW KNIGHT!!!!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-02-06, 09:34 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Sergeant
|
It seems that there are two groups who are adamantly peeved over the same thing in two different ways.
First, we have the group that can't figure out if incorporating mini-game reloading would work in Planetside 2. Do we have:
Then, we have the anti-macro crowd, whom are angry that people will use macros to do things, such as reload their gun (as well as other operations). Macros would also cause harm to the manual-reloading crowd:
So I ask a simple question - how about a magazine system? Planetside 1 already had this practically available, just not utilized. This would also prevent scripted/macro'd reloads and makes Higby's recommendation here a very useful, balanced ability. To break this idea down to Too Long; Didn't Read version, I have added colors to assist that. Magazine System Say you have five magazines of ammo. Each has 30 charges/rounds/whatever. You fire X of those charges/rounds and you realize you're almost out. You reload and go to the next magazine. That previous magazine is POCKETED to be used later. Four magazines later, you [run out of/are low on] ammo on your last magazine. In normal games, when you're out of bullets, you're out of bullets. However, you saved some ammo in the previous magazines, on purpose or by accident, for just this situation. Now you have two options.
This way, a mini-game winning macro is less useful because it's not as simple anymore, and a reloading attachment to a gun becomes much more meaningful, ESPECIALLY if it automatically sorts your ammo for you. I hope this effectively kills this conflict and we can solve similar conflicts in this fashion in the future. Last edited by Shanesan; 2012-02-06 at 10:06 PM. |
||
|
2012-02-06, 09:50 PM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
Master Sergeant
|
I think you're misunderstanding that first thread. It's not about auto-reload at all. It's about speeding up the time it takes to reload by adding a quick-time event.
At any rate; while I think this is an interesting concept; I get the feeling it would be very, very annoying in practice to have to manually 'reload' your magazines to prevent you from loading a half loaded mag in the middle of a fight. Realistic? Yes. Fun in a video game? No. Also, it rather goes against the whole "removing tedious down-time activities" motif they are pushing the game towards...
__________________
|
||
|
2012-02-06, 09:57 PM | [Ignore Me] #4 | |||||
Sergeant
|
Back to your statement, Mightymouser:
With the simplicity of the idea, the thought channels don't have to overthink and make it frustrating for the user. The user has plenty of options, and this feature opens up doors that many users should become introduced to. Last edited by Shanesan; 2012-02-06 at 10:16 PM. |
|||||
|
2012-02-06, 10:23 PM | [Ignore Me] #5 | |||
Master Sergeant
|
I get the feeling that many - not ALL - but many folks who would oppose this type of idea would argue that they don't like the idea of not having a full mag when someone comes around a corner. Its true, it would suck, and I'm sure I would rage at myself and my murderer just as much as the next guy. However, about 3 seconds later I would realize that this isn't necessarily about MY survival, or the individualized kill, intended for ME. Rather, I should be thinking "Excellent, even though I died, I sacrificed so that someone else could push in while that group/enemy was distracted, and if I only shot fifteen bullets, oh well - I helped my Empire - NC4LIFE! *gurrrglgleee*" This is a team based effort, and in the large scope of things, I feel that folks shouldn't necessarily be focusing on how a half-mag, one where they would need to reload manually, will disallow them a kill. You should be striving for the greater goal, not your K/D ratio. Many might argue that other reloading methods are 'easier,' but I would venture that these are the individuals who would also claim that their own K/D ratio determines the greater battle. To a degree, they would be right. But in the scheme of things, its one small blip on the radar, and team tactics/planning should win out over an auto 'clip filling' fairy that magically arranges your clips for you while you chase down that magmower. For those versed in sabremetrics, I would compare this to looking at player hitting average (individual play in an MMO) versus .OBP. (team-goal/Objective striving, with individual achievement supplementary.) The first one shouldn't matter, while the second one matters WAY more. I for one would like to put my stamp of approval on this 100% If I may be so bold Higby! Last edited by CidHighwind; 2012-02-06 at 10:54 PM. |
|||
|
2012-02-06, 10:29 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | ||
I think this is a pretty ingenous solution to a problem that shouldn't exist in the first place. If we didn't have TR's spray and pray playstyle, nobody would be complaining.
But in all reality, I do think that a solution similar to this adds a neat level of complexity and realism. It's yet another mechanism among many that rewards teamwork and thought-out strategy beyond twitch clicking and UI tweaks. And the thing I approve of here above all else, is that this would reward accuracy: the winner of any fight won't be the guy that has the highest-damage or largest-magazine gun, but the guy who lands the most bullets.
__________________
Doctors kill people one at a time. Engineers do it in batches. Interior Crocodile Aviator IronFist After Dark |
|||
|
2012-02-06, 10:41 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||
Corporal
|
I don't know if any of the ideas presented in these topics will work well, but I have to admit, I never gave much thought to reloading. These topics have actually somewhat piqued my interest in increasing the complexity of actions like reloading.
After all, it is a fairly important procedure that is made incredibly easy in game. |
||
|
2012-02-06, 10:57 PM | [Ignore Me] #8 | ||
First Sergeant
|
Or just go with Day of Defeat's system and when you reload, that magazine is kaput. Whatever ammo you had in it is done. 3 magazines means 3 reloads whether you empty the mag or shoot a single bullet.
|
||
|
2012-02-06, 11:00 PM | [Ignore Me] #9 | ||
Master Sergeant
|
It would certainly be easier, but why not have the mag available for those willing and wanting to use it to a tactical advantage? I feel as though tossing a partially spent magazine would be an archaic way of going about this.
|
||
|
2012-02-06, 11:17 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | |||
Private
|
Let's assume their mags are modular, shrink in size when empty, and can attach to other mags and combine their sizes. This would work with Shanie's idea. If a clip gets low, pocket it (because it is now much smaller when it's not full), and stick a new one on there. Once you run out of full mags, you can grab some of the old, but not dry, mags and link them together to create one, final mag that uses every last bullet. If they have lasers and aliens, I'm pretty sure they would have invented something a little more efficient than the kind of mags we use now. It's also more realistic than how current FPS games handle realoading, where you can fire one bullet, reload, and repeat over a hundred times. That's just silly. I fully support Shanie's idea. |
|||
|
2012-02-07, 12:42 AM | [Ignore Me] #11 | |||
Sergeant
|
That is definitely how the weapon modification slot should work. |
|||
|
2012-02-07, 05:38 AM | [Ignore Me] #12 | ||
Sergeant Major
|
Just use the standard FPS's reload system. There's really no reason to stray from the current system FPS's have.
Just because the game is the in the "future" doesn't mean everything has advanced. |
||
|
2012-02-07, 05:45 AM | [Ignore Me] #13 | ||
the idea sounds ok, but please please please:
no "fun minigames" for repetitive actions in planetside 2! while minigames can be fun for a few times, they always suck if you are forced to do them over and over again! anyone who has played masseffect should know what i am talking about. or the camera-hacking in bioshock. if there has to be an option to rearrange leftover bullets to one mag, make it a buttonpress with a progressbar and nothing complicated. remember, during a battle this will be used by most soldiers every minute.
__________________
***********************official bittervet********************* stand tall, fight bold, wear blue and gold! |
|||
|
2012-02-07, 05:50 AM | [Ignore Me] #14 | ||||
Colonel
|
Personally I mainly come from milsim shooters, but surprisingly I'm not 100% supporting the partial reload system. I've played games where the magazine will be pocketed in the condition it was in (so your last reload might just have 2 rounds in the magazine), but I'm not sure if it really added anything to the gameplay. So, while I'm a realism freak, I would still almost just have the magazines autofill themselves with the ammo you have left if you reload before the magazine is empty. That said, neither would I mind if there was like "tap R to reload quickly but lose potentially partial magazine in process" and "hold R to do a slower reload, but spare the partial magazine". Anything more complex than that in terms of minigames I would not do. Also, this:
__________________
|
||||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|