Rivers and river combat - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: Keep out of reach of children
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2012-03-30, 12:39 AM   [Ignore Me] #1
Stardouser
Colonel
 
Rivers and river combat


Now, I know, naval combat is something people want AND it's something within the realm of possibilities.

But what do you guys think of some continents having navegable rivers, and river gunboats that can patrol them? Part of the strategy of the map could include capturing the specific base and tech plant on the river necessary to spawn them, both to use it for yourself, or to take it away from the enemy.

This is actually separate from the naval combat idea, because these could be done independently of full size naval ships. There could be overlap I suppose, though, if there are naval ships for the oceans, I suppose they could go into rivers of the continents as well. Or vice versa, even if there are no full size naval ships, the river gunboats could (to the extent the rivers connect to the ocean) go out and circle around the shore.

Last edited by Stardouser; 2012-03-30 at 12:40 AM.
Stardouser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 12:46 AM   [Ignore Me] #2
Goku
Contributor
PSU Moderator
 
Goku's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


I would think this would be a good addition, but I think it to make worthwhile there would need to be a benefit to at least fighter over.

Cyssor in PS1 would of been perfect for river battles due to how much of it was broken up by water. Shame SOE never put in actual harbor type facility even just for Cyssor back then. Would of made Cyssor side a lot more enjoyable.
Goku is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 12:48 AM   [Ignore Me] #3
Stardouser
Colonel
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Wow, you're right. I actually started this thread because I had looked up photos of Esamir and saw some water inside the continent...seeing photos of Cyssor, that would be THE continent for this.
Stardouser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 12:49 AM   [Ignore Me] #4
Skitrel
Contributor
Captain
 
Skitrel's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Going on previous gaming history, what would be the purpose of them? What's the motivations for players to use them? What's their role in the overall strategy of the game?

As we've seen from numerous other fps games over the years, boats barely get used for anything other than getting from A to B.

Not to mention, even if they had a role to play in bridge battles in particular, that's a pretty small aspect of the big picture and they'd barely get used otherwise no?

I can see them getting used if they were VERY fast and there's some excellent rivers to use on the continent to travel deep into enemy territory fast, otherwise I'm just not sure, other than perhaps a map like Cyssor.
__________________

Mod: /r/gamernews
Join The Enclave: http://www.enclaveoilrig.com
Skitrel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 12:53 AM   [Ignore Me] #5
Zulthus
Colonel
 
Zulthus's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Absolutely no harm in adding them. Many players would enjoy using them and could provide tactical advantages over other players. It'd definitely mix up gameplay.
Zulthus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 12:56 AM   [Ignore Me] #6
Stardouser
Colonel
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Well, I imagine they would principally be used for defending bridge crossings, though I suppose they could be used, if possible, to go out on the out shoreline of the continent and take a raider squad behind enemy lines.

The biggest question would be, how many of them can there be? I'm guessing they would have a pilot/driver, and 3 weapon platforms: one front and one rear cannon, each about as powerful as a regular tank's weapon, and a modest AA/anti-infantry gun that, by itself, could probably only stand up to lighter aircraft.

I'm assuming that people who would ride on it, by the way, would literally be standing on it, and not locked into a position like they are in say, a Galaxy.

Just out of curiosity, were there any PS1 vehicles that people could ride on by standing on?
Stardouser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 12:58 AM   [Ignore Me] #7
EVILPIG
Contributor
Colonel
 
EVILPIG's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Originally Posted by Stardouser View Post
Now, I know, naval combat is something people want
I disagree.
__________________
"That which does not kill us,
makes us stronger
" -Nietzsche

www.planetside-devildogs.com
EVILPIG is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 12:58 AM   [Ignore Me] #8
Zulthus
Colonel
 
Zulthus's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Originally Posted by Stardouser View Post

Just out of curiosity, were there any PS1 vehicles that people could ride on by standing on?

The most the game allowed you to do was stand on top of an aircraft as it elevated straight up. Moving in any direction caused you to fall off.
Zulthus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 01:02 AM   [Ignore Me] #9
Goku
Contributor
PSU Moderator
 
Goku's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Originally Posted by Stardouser View Post
Wow, you're right. I actually started this thread because I had looked up photos of Esamir and saw some water inside the continent...seeing photos of Cyssor, that would be THE continent for this.
Yeah Cyssor is a perfect candidate for such types of battles due to being able to navigate through much of the cont if you had the proper transport.

Originally Posted by Skitrel View Post
Going on previous gaming history, what would be the purpose of them? What's the motivations for players to use them? What's their role in the overall strategy of the game?

As we've seen from numerous other fps games over the years, boats barely get used for anything other than getting from A to B.

Not to mention, even if they had a role to play in bridge battles in particular, that's a pretty small aspect of the big picture and they'd barely get used otherwise no?

I can see them getting used if they were VERY fast and there's some excellent rivers to use on the continent to travel deep into enemy territory fast, otherwise I'm just not sure, other than perhaps a map like Cyssor.
Well that is the problem as you said. If Cyssor ever makes a comeback in this game perhaps the devs could make the cont for more river based combat. This could be a frontier area, so there isn't any or as many bridges for transport compared to others. Causing people to use the river to cross and for transport due to the majority of ground vehicles being useless to get to the other areas. Only major problem I see with this is the VS having a advantage due to their Magrider. Although a anti-tank type of weapon on the gunboat could always just down those with no problem. That would at least change up the game play methods a bit for this map. Even Hossin would be a bad idea if there was actual huge swamps making it hard for any land vehicle to get around. Good for infantry battles and making use of the boats.
Goku is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 01:25 AM   [Ignore Me] #10
Mechzz
Major
 
Mechzz's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Well, there have already been boats in this game for years.

They're called .... Magriders.....

Vanu technology allows our vehicles to float on water. Some of the common pool vehicles were also given the ability to float I think, so there has been limited water-based combat for some time.

Here's a thought on naval combat to make it not just "A to B", which I agree is all it tends to be.

We're on a planet, Auraxis, right?

So if your faction dominates the "ocean" between Cyssor and Esamir for example, then no resources for other empires can cross the ocean. Resources are too bulky and dangerous to be used with warp technology, so they need to be transported by sea.

This would, of course, need to be implemented with one-man battleships so we could all drive and guns these behemoths of the seas on our own, right?
Mechzz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 01:47 AM   [Ignore Me] #11
Furber
First Sergeant
 
Furber's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Cool idea, but I wonder if it's a bit too late. Maybe post launch? I'm all for this idea
Furber is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 02:43 AM   [Ignore Me] #12
Lonehunter
Lieutenant General
 
Lonehunter's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Rivers would be a great stepping stone towards real naval combat in oceans.
__________________
Originally Posted by Higby View Post
And if you back in 2003 decided you wanted to play RTS games, between then and now you'd have dozens of RTS games you could have played. If you decided to play MMOFPS' between then and now, there were none
Lonehunter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 03:57 AM   [Ignore Me] #13
Canaris
Contributor
General
 
Canaris's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Originally Posted by Mechzz View Post
Well, there have already been boats in this game for years.

They're called .... Magriders.....

Vanu technology allows our vehicles to float on water. Some of the common pool vehicles were also given the ability to float I think, so there has been limited water-based combat for some time.
Not to mention and all it's variants


A week or so ago we had a full platoon in Raiders and we ran the Magriders out of the Sea.

TR NAVY RAIDERS RULE THE WAVES!
__________________

"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war, and now there ain't no going back. I mean shit, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it! If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight. "
Slim Charles aka Tallman - The Wire
BRTD Mumble Server powered by Gamercomms
Canaris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 04:29 AM   [Ignore Me] #14
noxious
Second Lieutenant
 
noxious's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Originally Posted by Zulthus View Post
Absolutely no harm in adding them. Many players would enjoy using them and could provide tactical advantages over other players. It'd definitely mix up gameplay.
The harm would be in diverting resources from more meaningful additions. Realistically, boats in rivers just won't be used for anything but transport. They're not very useful in real combat. They're not very useful in video game combat. There are much more important things that can be added to the game.
__________________
noxious is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 05:04 AM   [Ignore Me] #15
Mechzz
Major
 
Mechzz's Avatar
 
Re: Rivers and river combat


Originally Posted by Canaris View Post
[/IMG]
A week or so ago we had a full platoon in Raiders and we ran the Magriders out of the Sea.
Wow! I would have paid to be even on the losing side in that one!
Once it becomes easier to find awesome incidents like this again, rather than playing for a month and getting maybe one or two, this game (PS2) will be where it belongs - at the top of the list and GOTY.
Mechzz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.