Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Taters gonna tate.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-06-12, 02:17 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Private
|
New to PS. Been reading the forums here for a bit getting acquainted with what PS and PS2 is.
I think the game will be great, mixing fps with mmo aspects win win in my book.... however... What really worries is the f2p model. I know no information much has been released other than its f2p and they promise "no pay to in features". But i have played my fairshare of f2p games that promised the exact samething and i will tell you, a company adds those things in in a sublte way everytime. Sony maybe differenty, Higby and the crew may be different..i can only hope. A 2nd point i would like to make about f2p, and i think some have mentioned this as a possiblity, is the ability to pay a sub and have access to cosmetic items and the like or somthing to that nature. Maybe im to draconic in my thinking when i say, if 10 to 15 bucks a month is too much for someone to pay a sub and have access to everything in the game, cosemtic and the like, then perhaps people should rethink their priorities in life and not play until they can. Companies can make money from a 10 15 mnth sub fee, the problem is to many are money grubbing from the OCD nature of the gaming community that is about imho....do dont let them fool ya and say that cant make a profit from subs... Anyway...not here to rant to much but do hope the game turns out well, Over and out...from a new PS semi-fan..... |
||
|
2012-06-12, 02:18 PM | [Ignore Me] #2 | |||
Contributor PlanetSide 2
Game Designer |
|
|||
|
2012-06-12, 02:25 PM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Private
|
You know ive seen that vid before..and again it rings what ive said about cash shop f2p and experiences ive had true...
Fact is, greed runs f2p models pure and simple, no amount of videos will hide that fact. Now like i said if they keep the pay to win crap out of the game then its all good....but again i advise in my experiences which are many, it doesnt hold true in the free to play business mode. |
||
|
2012-06-12, 02:30 PM | [Ignore Me] #5 | |||
F2P will work for PS2 because it will keep populations up with a never ending stream of new and returning players with its ease of access. PS2 needs F2P as far as I am concerned.
__________________
| Member | cyberneticpunks.com - Hostile Takeovers - Liquidation - No Survivors | Join the new face of the old guard. |
||||
|
2012-06-12, 02:30 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
Subscriptions are almost gone. The shift to F2P across the entire industry has been making it tougher to run games with a subscription fee. Sure they could ask for a subscription, but the goal is constant battle and servers that are always full and active, and to allow as many players as possible to join the action.
With major hardware requirements and decent connection requirements, it is also nice to let everyone try before they buy to see if they can even run PS2 to begin with. They may have premium subscriptions that give free access to all aesthetics (like you said) or do "Monthly Threads" packages where the user can buy all the aesthetic items for 31 days at a time. Cosmetic is different than equipment though. Equipment that is purchased and unlocked is available for certifications to be spent on it. I definitely don't feel that all weapons should be available for $15 a month. Here's what I'd put into a monthly premium subscription: - Full access to aesthetic items. - 50% resource and experience boosters. - Queue Advancement - Be ahead of all non-Premium users when getting through server or continent queues. - Test Server Access (try the latest build before it releases) - 500 SC (since subscriptions probably won't be paid in SC, only money) - Maybe 10000 Auraxium as well.
__________________
|
||
|
2012-06-12, 02:37 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | |||
Contributor PlanetSide 2
Game Designer |
F2P is a good monetization model and it keeps games healthily populated. Players are the content. When you lower the price to play you increase player population. The model also allows you to spend as much or as little as you want.
Yes, they can screw it up by selling power, and that's a topic that has been discussed many times and they've assured us many times that they will not sell power. Their current business model as we understand it can be found here from Matt Higby himself: http://www.reddit.com/r/Planetside/c...be_p2w/c4aq4bf
|
|||
|
2012-06-12, 02:48 PM | [Ignore Me] #8 | ||
Master Sergeant
|
i gladly paid to play ps1 when it was being run well and supported. i think pretty much every ps1 vet would agree that they would too. seeing how amazing this game looks atm i'm sure many of the former peeps are lining up to have higby pillage their wallets. am i wrong? anyone? anyone ? >.>
|
||
|
2012-06-12, 03:10 PM | [Ignore Me] #9 | ||
Sergeant Major
|
Bottom line: Companies need to make money. That's how this whole thing called "economics" works (in a monetary system, anyways); there are way more pros than cons on the ftp model as opposed to subscription. Ultimately it's going to be cheaper for people unless they want to buy things. This game can be totally and completely free, or you can pay for extras that you want (or for weapons/etc... that will be available anyways, but just get them faster).
|
||
|
2012-06-12, 04:39 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||
Sergeant
|
Gotta have F2P on the game. Makes it real easy to talk people into at least trying the game out. Which without a big legacy behind it will be necessary to pull in new blood.
Also if I tire of the game I can walk away and a month come back without wasting more cash. This will give better populations on the servers. Some players like in BF3 are ok with purchasing a box, but wouldn't pay a sub. Since there are alternatives you only buy into <--- or like TF2 you don't have to, you don't want to offer a slightly better game and have people say that they don't want to keep paying. I think this will really move forward the game. And if you can't get camo besides purchasing for SC then I see some real sales at the start. I had a hard time picking out some people with camo during the streams, I think a lot of people will be buying those. |
||
|
2012-06-12, 04:54 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
Second Lieutenant
|
They've told us so many times they will not sell power... at least not power that you can't aquire by also only playing the game... might take longer, but you don't have to pay for it you don't want to. They get that question over and over by gaming press and the answer is always the same. And I do believe them when they say it, not only becuse they seem like such a great bunch of people that actually care about the game, not only making money off of it.
But once a company breaks "promises" of that nature, they don't only lose money from players leaving the game, they lose money from loss of trust in every other area of the company, so to speak. It's in their best interest, imho, to stay true to the whole 'not selling power' deal... both for the games sake, and the companys sake. But I for one will buy stuff on the market just to support them, even though I don't have to.
__________________
|
||
|
2012-06-12, 05:11 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
Don't forget merchandise. Dog tags, hats, shirts, window clings, posters, empire-specific SOE Authenticators, just for starters.
They could even go as far as custom bike helmets, bumper stickers or automotive decals, costume weapons and armor, miniatures and models and figurines, etc. If each item comes with 500 or 1000 station cash, it'll sweeten the deal even more for customers. Some amount of the money goes back to the cost of producing the merchandise, some goes to paying for PS2.
__________________
|
||
|
2012-06-12, 07:03 PM | [Ignore Me] #15 | |||
Contributor Major
|
Calling SOE money grubbing for making the game F2P is uncalled for. This guy deserves to have some humor thrown at him. Of course SOE is money grubbing, they are a company aiming to make money. We don't fault them for that. Last edited by ArmedZealot; 2012-06-12 at 07:10 PM. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|