Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: I bet you're looking at this right now!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-11-25, 11:05 AM | [Ignore Me] #1 | |||
Captain
|
Hey, right now this is my setup:
The motherboard is going to be some form of the z77 (I had the ASRock Extreme4, but that's out of stock at the moment, so I'll see what happens.) My main question is: Should I go with the i5-3570K http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819116504 or the i7-2600k http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115070 Right now, the price difference is only $50. I plan on overclocking (I have a Hyper 212+ with the push/pull configuration.) I wanted the i5 Ivy Bridge at first, but I'm afraid that it may be limited in the future because it doesn't have hyper threading. I just don't want to feel the same way I do now having spent the money on the AMD and having cruddy performance, and since I don't know when the next time I'll be able to afford an upgrade, I want something that will last (hence why I'm looking at the sandy bridge, because I know the differences between SB/IB isn't a huge bit.) I mostly play games, though sometimes I do record using Dxtory (and editing in Vegas, but not that much,) and I know the more cores, the better that'll go. Sorry that this is dragging on, but thanks for any advice you can give to sway me.
__________________
|
|||
|
2012-11-25, 11:16 AM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
Colonel
|
Gaming-wise, hyper-threading is unlikely to become useful. In fact, I seem to remember the i7s can actually end up having worse performance than their i5 counterparts (albeit nothing really significant).
That said, it sounds to me like you already want to buy the 2600k. If that's the case, decide whether $50 is worth avoiding potential purchaser regrets. |
||
|
2012-11-26, 11:10 AM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
3570.
It consumes less power by nearly 20W and it's cheaper. (it' even got better graphics capability, not that it matters) I haven't gone digging for benchmarks but, in games, I wouldn't be surprised if the i5 wins by a small margin.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
2012-11-26, 12:02 PM | [Ignore Me] #5 | |||
Captain
|
I really can't get a good answer on if the Phase Power design thing really matters that much (It's 8+3 instead of 8+4 on the Extreme4.) I guess I could get the i5-3570, but I'd imagine OCing would be a bit more time consuming without the unlocked multiplier.
__________________
Last edited by duomaxwl; 2012-11-26 at 12:10 PM. |
|||
|
2012-11-26, 03:00 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | ||
Yeah, I meant the 'K'. If you want to overclock that's where you need to go...I don't think there's a non-k 3570, I think it's a 3550
As far as motherboards...what are you going to miss if you go lower?
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
2012-11-26, 03:06 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||
Captain
|
Nothing really, I just heard a bunch of stuff about the 8 + 3 Power Phase and how it wasn't as good as the 8 + 4, but I think I'm just going to get that motherboard and call it a day. All the fancy power phase stuff is above my head anyway. I found the processor on Amazon the same price it was on Newegg, and I'm going to do pull the trigger on that one. Thanks for the advice guys!
__________________
|
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|