Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: Is Werner some sort of a hotdog?
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2013-04-23, 09:26 PM   [Ignore Me] #1
Sunrock
Major
 
Sunrock's Avatar
 
Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


I am so sick and tiered of the claymore only have 45° trigger radius but the NC and VS have 360°

It's just pure dumb luck if some one dies to it because either it is placed so the enemy see it easily or it is easily avoided.
Sunrock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-23, 09:28 PM   [Ignore Me] #2
Hamma
PSU Admin
 
Hamma's Avatar
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


I'm more upset about it myself because it has those massive green lasers that are easily spotted whereas the NC/VS ones are almost invisible.
__________________

PlanetSide Universe - Administrator / Site Owner - Contact @ PSU
Hamma Time - Evil Ranting Admin - DragonWolves - Commanding Officer
Hamma is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-23, 09:29 PM   [Ignore Me] #3
Sunrock
Major
 
Sunrock's Avatar
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


Yea I forgot to mention those damn laser that indicates where you should avoid to step too if you don't want to trigger it.
Sunrock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-23, 09:57 PM   [Ignore Me] #4
bpostal
Contributor
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


We'll file this under: Reasons to not waste certs on Claymores.

I'd rather put a tank mine down and shoot the damn thing.
__________________

Smoke me a Kipper, I'll be back for breakfast
bpostal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-23, 10:05 PM   [Ignore Me] #5
Neutral Calypso
Sergeant Major
 
Neutral Calypso's Avatar
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


I have had good success with claymores myself.

...and also my vanu toon can confirm that the green lasers are no longer visible on them to other factions.

At least, they weren't the last time I played vanu.

The problem with claymores is they pretty much require you to place them just around corners and such. However, when placed effectively, I have had excellent success with them lately.

I'd be more annoyed with how enemies can just toss their AI mines on the run with little trouble. Though I will have to experiment with whether one can do anything even remotely similar with claymores. ~_~
Neutral Calypso is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-23, 10:21 PM   [Ignore Me] #6
Whiteagle
Major
 
Whiteagle's Avatar
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


Well shouldn't the Claymore have longer reach since it's a directional charge?
Whiteagle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-23, 11:18 PM   [Ignore Me] #7
Rbstr
Contributor
Lieutenant General
 
Rbstr's Avatar
 
Misc Info
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


As VS, I honestly don't ever notice the claymores.

But that's because I wear flack armor and walk through doors with impunity.
__________________

All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.
Rbstr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-23, 11:32 PM   [Ignore Me] #8
AThreatToYou
Major
 
AThreatToYou's Avatar
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


IIRC, Claymores have a farther trigger radius than NC/VS mines and can be placed on the side of a door and still trigger no matter where the enemy walks through it.

also IIRC, Claymores were basically shotgun mines that should have a long and wide kill radius, probably much more than an explosive, although it's obviously not 360 degrees.

but I'll say
I hate VS mines more than I hate claymores because I can't freaking see them. I've actually seen a couple claymores and dodged em, so there's that. It must suck for you TR having to fight two factions that don't have claymore.

Last edited by AThreatToYou; 2013-04-23 at 11:34 PM.
AThreatToYou is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-24, 02:22 AM   [Ignore Me] #9
WSNeo
Master Sergeant
 
WSNeo's Avatar
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


Originally Posted by AThreatToYou View Post
I hate VS mines more than I hate claymores because I can't freaking see them. I've actually seen a couple claymores and dodged em, so there's that. It must suck for you TR having to fight two factions that don't have claymore.
Pfft, our mines are teal and purple, how can you not see them :P

__________________


WSNeo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-24, 02:36 AM   [Ignore Me] #10
Falcon_br
Captain
 
Falcon_br's Avatar
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


Originally Posted by AThreatToYou View Post
IIRC, Claymores have a farther trigger radius than NC/VS mines and can be placed on the side of a door and still trigger no matter where the enemy walks through it.

also IIRC, Claymores were basically shotgun mines that should have a long and wide kill radius, probably much more than an explosive, although it's obviously not 360 degrees.

but I'll say
I hate VS mines more than I hate claymores because I can't freaking see them. I've actually seen a couple claymores and dodged em, so there's that. It must suck for you TR having to fight two factions that don't have claymore.
So, you don´t now they got more nerfed them the other mines!
Now they don´t even have a reach to cover completely a "door" to capture point or generators, people can jump or just enter from the other corner of the "door" so the mine don´t explode.
Before the anti personal mine nerf, we could get some multikill for been directional.
Now, if we can kill one with it, we got luck!
Also, the triggering radius it the same as the other empire, but one direction only! Is just have 20% more reach that doesn't matter because you can´t place it in the middle of the door, you must place it on a corner.
And I really don´t know what is the difference in the proximity mine and the jumping mine, my suggestions to nerf them, is making the jumping one doing 50% damage to crouched infantry, and the motion mine don´t triggering unless the enemy is running with shift. So the other faction can know what is having a usefulness mine that most be combined with anti tank mines if you want to kill someone.
Also today a proximity mine just did more them 60% damage to me using full flak armor, what It was really strange, normally I just lost shields for it and it happened twice today, maybe they got buffed in the last stealth patch?
__________________

In planetside since the close beta of the first game!
Outfit Brasileira de Planetside 2
Falcon_br is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-24, 03:09 AM   [Ignore Me] #11
Canaris
Contributor
General
 
Canaris's Avatar
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


There's only 2 options for fixing this that would be acceptable.

Either the TR claymores become like the Betties & Prox Mines or those two become like the claymore.
__________________

"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war, and now there ain't no going back. I mean shit, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it! If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight. "
Slim Charles aka Tallman - The Wire
BRTD Mumble Server powered by Gamercomms
Canaris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-24, 03:36 AM   [Ignore Me] #12
camycamera
Major
 
camycamera's Avatar
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


Originally Posted by Hamma View Post
I'm more upset about it myself because it has those massive green lasers that are easily spotted whereas the NC/VS ones are almost invisible.

fucking same.

edit: AND SRSLY?! IT ONLY HAS A 45 DEGREE ANGLE?! this is fucking bullshit. needs an overhaul, and that is common sense that it needs one.

no wonder i have only got 1 kill with it.

and we NEED TO BE ABLE TO PICK IT BACK UP AGAIN, SAME AS C4

Last edited by camycamera; 2013-04-24 at 03:40 AM.
camycamera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-24, 03:43 AM   [Ignore Me] #13
ShepardCommand
Private
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


Whining that your cheap loser weapon isn't as effective as the others?

I want a secondary weapon that doubles as an SMG. Repeater is beyond OP compared to all other faction specific pistols. Then we can talk.

Last edited by ShepardCommand; 2013-04-24 at 03:47 AM.
ShepardCommand is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-24, 03:43 AM   [Ignore Me] #14
Gatekeeper
Sergeant Major
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


As a VS I can say that both Betties and Claymores are effective (in killing me, at least), but Claymores are a *lot* easier to spot. Personally I'd prefer they make Betties and Prox Mines easier to see, rather than changing Claymores.
__________________

Gatekeeper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-24, 03:47 AM   [Ignore Me] #15
Sunrock
Major
 
Sunrock's Avatar
 
Re: Claymore sucks compare to other factions anti infantry mines


Originally Posted by Neutral Calypso View Post

I'd be more annoyed with how enemies can just toss their AI mines on the run with little trouble. Though I will have to experiment with whether one can do anything even remotely similar with claymores. ~_~
Jup this is what anoys the crap out of me. When I'm runing after some one and they just throw a AI mine down that is totally invisible... And no I don't think you can. I have placed claymores down in front of an enemy but I think it takes a few sec for the claymore to "deploy" so as long as the enemy is moving it's just a freak chance he dies and most likely after he killed you.

Originally Posted by Whiteagle View Post
Well shouldn't the Claymore have longer reach since it's a directional charge?
It has a little bit longer reach but it's not just very little.

Originally Posted by AThreatToYou View Post
IIRC, Claymores have a farther trigger radius than NC/VS mines and can be placed on the side of a door and still trigger no matter where the enemy walks through it.

Well regarding cover the door. If you place the claymore so it can't be seen from the other side of the door then it won't cover all of it. You can "sneek" by if you press your self against the door frail posit of where the claymore is placed.


But yes the claymore is very good if you place them at a "door" but that is the only place you can place claymores to be effective.

If you try to drop some claymore at a capture point, spawn tube or anywhere else they are far from as effective as the other AI mines.

One solution maybe is to allow TR to carry up to 4 claymores without having to wearing any suit slots that allow you to carry more. Also that after you have placed them you can fine tune there aim. That way there are more strategic value then just "door stoppers".
Sunrock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.