Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Not porn, but it'll do.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2013-07-25, 02:23 PM | [Ignore Me] #3 | ||
Major
|
Your reviews are always good but I don't trust them too much tbh. I recommend you spend at least a week of intense fighting with a new gun that just got released before doing a review on it. There's no need to rush to be the first with a review of a new weapon imo.
|
||
|
2013-07-26, 12:04 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | |||
Major
|
But here's the thing: I want to know more than a first impression of "Is this gun any good?" As TR player, should I give up my trusted hipfire solutions, LC3 Jaguar, TAR and MSW-R for this gun that has an inferior DPS/DPM on every range? And how does this question compared with other empires? How does the added handling bonus compare in reality against the superior damage statistics of its competitors? Does the increased hit statistics make up for the lower damage output? What are the tactics you should aim for anyway when using this gun? Answering these very important questions undeniably takes more time than playing only for a day and getting only 75 kills, which is why I take your reviews, while not being bad in itself, usually with a grain of salt tbh. It's clearly written for newer players that want quick answers and shortcuts. For in-depth analysis, people like Wrel do a far better job atm imo. |
|||
|
2013-07-26, 12:42 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||
Major
|
You should really know by know the limits that come to play with testing guns in VR-only or preview-only circumstances. That's where these YouTuber reviews can come in handy. Provided they are more indepth than this review, which is a nice review, don't get me wrong, but it doesn't address key questions lots of players have when comparing this gun to their current arsenal.
|
||
|
2013-07-26, 01:15 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | |||
Major
|
Even Wrel tends to compare weapons with other weapons in their category... it just makes sense. Then to add to that neither of these YouTubers try to make a gun the next flavor of the month. They simply tell you what they feel the strengths and weaknesses are and if that falls into YOUR playstyle then maybe you should consider looking at the gun yourself. |
|||
|
2013-07-26, 05:18 PM | [Ignore Me] #13 | ||
Private
|
When I played with this gun yesterday on Esamir I had a rather hard time with it, but I decided to put that down to lag and give it a second going over on Indar. I ended up liking it a lot more there. Originally I was using the forgrip, but that did not turn out as effective as I had heard from others. I find it rather reliable all round with the laser sight. Also, that backend can double up as a sandwich compartment.
I like having a CQC that isn't as extreme as the other SMGs, something between them and the CQC carbines. The best thing about it however is its looks. The black one looks absolutely killer in my hands. They're like Daleks in that respect. Who needs to worry about stats... just so long as you look good. (heck, half the reason I use the Emperor over the Repeater is because of the name.) There is one issue however. The Sirius. It feels like this gun was made to lose to the Sirius. Now that would be fine by me normally, I have nothing against the 2nd gen SMGs. But it felt like tonight every second Vanu on Miller was using the Sirius. Siriusly. It was a real headbanger all night for me. Every time I ran into someone using that gun everything just went sour afterwards. Now listen, Vanu. I know the concepts of aiming and managing recoil are quite alien to you (hurr), but you do have other weapons, and some of them are really nice I assure you. Like the Beamer. Last edited by Shuuda; 2013-07-26 at 05:21 PM. |
||
|
2013-07-26, 06:01 PM | [Ignore Me] #14 | ||
Major
|
What makes you think I want to troll DrankTHEKoolaid? I actually like this guy's video's and I'm a subscriber of the first hour. I'm just giving him feedback so he hopefully becomes better at what he does on YouTube. Releasing gun "reviews" right after release just doesn't serve him right in my modest opinion, although I can understand there's a demand for it. By my standards, I would call these "first impressions" and not "reviews".
|
||
|
2013-07-26, 11:16 PM | [Ignore Me] #15 | |||
Private
|
Thanks for the feedback! |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|